Answer:
The rational, reality-oriented component of the personality, according to Freud, is known as the Id.
Explanation:
Freud set three states, or levels of the personality; ego, id, superego.
- Ego refers to the <em>innate impulses</em>, the <em>"animal"</em> in us.
- Superego acts as a moral compass, guiding the individual towards the path generally accepted by society.
Id is the mediator between the two pervious terms; it is governed by the reality principle. It calms both states down in order to help the person to mend more into society. The id prevents the ego from taking over and only looking for short term gratification and it prevents toe superego from "suffocating" the individual with its restrictive nature.
To summarize, it is the rational, reality-oriented component which regulates both sides.
Answer:
Confirmation Bias
Explanation:
Confirmation bias is a deep seated tendency to prefer information that confirms our existing positions. The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion draws all things else to support and agree with it. And though there is a greater number and weight of instances to be found not true, he either neglects, despises or rejects in order that by this great and pernicious determination the authority of its conclusions may remain inviolate. Confirmation bias is found to be important because it may lead people to hold strongly to false beliefs or give more weight to information that supports their beliefs than is warranted by evidences. This biased approach is largely unintentional and often results in ignoring inconsistent information
This is a well known psychological tendency
I believe the answer is: b. interviewing people who are in the news.
By interviewing people who are in the news, Political candidates could have a platform to give further explanation regarding their past actions or plan in the future. This will keep the audience informed regarding what's going on in the government and help them to make their decision in the next election.
Answer:
Naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies
Explanation:
Three of the most common research methods are naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies. Each one of them brings something different to the table:
- Naturalistic observation refers to studying subjects directly on their environment without any intervention from the researcher. This is a great method because watching people behave in a natural way will be very revealing and more truthful. When subjects know they are being observed, they often change their behaviour. Naturalistic observation thus requires the observer to be as anonymous and invisible as possible.
- An interview is a research method where the subject is asked to answer to some specific questions crafted by the researcher. Interviews allow the researchers have a much closer look at the subject, trying to ascertain the motives behind their behaviour. However, a problem with interviews is that the subjects often time won't respond truthfully, but will adjust their answers to what is expected from them.
- A case study is a method that goes more in depth than the other two, and the researcher tries to learn as much as possible about the subject through a variety of other methods, like observations, interviews, surveys, etc. Case studies are much thorough and deeper investigations, but they can be very time consuming, and require a subject that is willing to facilitate the work of the researcher, which isn't always possible.
