Step-by-step explanation:
In given rt.angled triangle,
Sin thita =p/h
=26.1/28.7
=0.9094
So correct answer is option D.
Answer:
0.665
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: 100 people are split into two groups 70 and 30. I group is given cough syrup treatment but second group did not.
Prob for a person to be in the cough medication group = 0.70
Out of people who received medication, 34% did not have cough
Prob for a person to be in cough medication and did not have cough
=
Prob for a person to be not in cough medication and did not have cough
=
Probability for a person not to have cough
= P(M1C')+P(M2C')
where M1 = event of having medication and M2 = not having medication and C' not having cough
This is because M1 and M2 are mutually exclusive and exhaustive
SO P(C') = 0.397+0.2=0.597
Hence required prob =P(M1/C') = 
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
To begin simplifying this, we can first divide the coefficients, giving us:
We know that when dividing exponents, this means we need to subtract the exponent on the denominator from the numerator. This gives us:
Now, simplifying this gets:
Answer:
even numbers greater than 50 and prime numbers greater than 50
Step-by-step explanation:
An event can be considered as mutually exclusive in probability and statistics when two sample propositions cannot be held as true by any means. Therefore, the pair that clearly illustrates a mutually exclusive event would be "even numbers greater than 50 and prime numbers greater than 50."
The only prime number that is even is 2, so even numbers over 50 would be divisible by 2, and then not prime.
Answer:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
