The arbitrage profit implied by these prices is $5.24.
<h3>Arbitrage profit</h3>
Given:
Future contract= 1645
Sport gold price = 1592
Risk-free rate (rf) = .03
Hence:
Arbitrage profit=1645-[1592(1+1.03)¹]
Arbitrage profit=1645- 1639.76
Arbitrage profit=1645 =$5.24
Therefore the arbitrage profit implied by these prices is $5.24.
Learn more about arbitrage profit here:brainly.com/question/15394730
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
The article is "Copyright infringement and the Intellectual Property Complaints on Amazon. It was published on December, 12th 2018.
There has been an increase in the number of complaints about intellectual property violations and the copyright infringement at Amazon Inc. In order to counterfeit each other, sellers copy the features of each other’s products, thereby violating the intellectual property rights. Sellers have been filing complaints against one other at the company.
Amazon has also been trying hard to stop increasing cases of such liability litigations. Amazon has been removing any listing that has probability of copyright infringement. Sellers are also encouraged to take preventive actions when listing their products on the platform.
The adverse effects of copyright infringement on the overall society include:
• Copyright infringement can lower the quality of consumer goods. There will be lesser quality goods rather there'll be more of goods in terms of quantity.
• The overall economy will get impacted as there will be more legal cases. Legal penalties in society will also increase due to Sellers taking each others to court.
Answer:
Assumptions and expectations are the root causes of workplace constraints.
Explanation:
To avoid workplace conflicts one needs detailed information and clarity. If we train ourselves to think in a positive way and act without anger will do wonders. Our conduct in a situation is going to be really different if we take some time to look at good intentions instead of immediately reacting. It's much more productive to turn a bunch of assumptions into a shared understanding of the information.
Explanation:
Compare and Contrast ->
Roles of the federal government -> Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
U.S.Government => Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
Pacific Railway Act (1862)-They have been granted 20 square miles of land per 1 mile of the track laid down. It strongly encouraged the construction of transcontinental railway lines, contributing to five different transcontinental roads: Union Pacific RR, Central Pacific RR, South Pacific RR, North Pacific RR and the Great North. The Grants Act of Morrill Land (1862)-gave state free land.
U.S.Government => Roles of the federal government
Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)The purpose was to promote economic competition through the regulation of shares, cartels and monopolies. It was very uncompromisingly applied Interstate Trade Act (1887). It also prohibits discrimination against shippers and pays more on the same train for shorter routes than for longer routes.
Thesis:
In the 19th Century and in themid-19th Century, the government of the United States was much more a proponent of industrialisation then an industrialisation regulator than a regulator.
In the year 1862, for instance, congress took place on the Pacific Railway Act, which gave the railway lines 20 acres per mile. This eventually culminated in five transcontinental trains: Union Pacific Railways, Central Pacific Railways, North American Railways, South Pacific Railways, and the Great North.In end, this resulted in the creation of booming towns in the west, encouraging manufacturers to relocate to their inhabitants and enabling businesses to sell their products to remote locations that were once hard to reach. Congress also enacted Morrill's 1861 Tariff Act which substituted for a higher tariff for the limited import tariff inserted in 1816. This shielded businesses from foreign competitors and increased their profits so that they could increase their power. The US government in general has been a more aggressive manufacturing supporter.
Answer:
shifts in the demand curve
Explanation:
Aggregate demand is total value of goods and services demanded at a particular time in an economy. It indicate goods and services that will be bought at different prices.
The determinants of aggregate demand are factors that could cause shift in aggregate demand curve either to the left or right. A shift in aggregate demand curve to the right means an increase in quantity demand while a shift to the left means a decrease in quantity demand at every price level.
The determinants are ;
Price of the goods - An increase in price of the goods itself will bring about shift in the demand curve to the left and vice versa
Consumer expectations- When consumers expect price of goods to be high, demand curve would shift to the right and vice versa.
Price of related goods- An increase in price of related or complementary good would cause the demand to either shift to the left or right.
Income of the buyers - Increase in come of buyers would shift the demand curve to the right and vice versa.
Taste or preference of consumers- When consumer's preference shift in favour of a product, demand for such product would increase thus shifting the demand curve to the right.
