Answer:
The right answer is:
a.H0: μd = 0; H1: μd > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim that want to be tested is that the sales were significantly increased after the commercial, indicanting that the advertisement campaign was effective.
This claim is usually expressed in the alternative hypothesis as it has to have enough evidence to prove that it is true.
Then, the alternative hypothesis H1 should state that the difference (sales after - sales before) is higher than 0.
The null hypothesis would state that the difference is not significantly different from 0, or, in other words, that the sales are the same before and after and that the variation is due to pure chance.
Then, the null hypothesis H0 would state that the difference is equal to 0.
The right answer is:
a.H0: μd = 0; H1: μd > 0
Answer:
What we are going to do for this case is find the cost for each case:
Cost to run the car before the mechanic worked on it:
Cost to run the car after the mechanic worked on it:
The difference between both cases is:
Answer:
It cost to run the car after the mechanic worked on it 0.01 $ / mile less than before the mechanic worked on it.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/2528459#readmoreStep-by-step explanation:
If x is the age of S
And y is the age of K
So we have x=y+3
And the second equation is x-3 + 2/3)y = 12
We have to solve the system
x-y=3
x+2/3y=15
we find x=10.2 and y=7.2
<span>so Katie is 7 </span>
You move the were the decimal to the 2 places to the right and its 3.4%
