1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BARSIC [14]
3 years ago
11

Erin works for a dry-cleaning company that has a contract with the U.S. government. To save on cleaning fluid, her boss orders h

er to wash some clothes that are supposed to be dry-cleaned in a washing machine. When the courier hired to pick up the cleaned garments arrives, Erin tells him about her boss's actions. Erin tells no one else about what is going on and is later fired. Erin
is not protected by the whistleblower statute because she failed to inform the proper party of the contract violation
History
1 answer:
Naya [18.7K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: a. is not protected by the whistleblower statute because she failed to inform the proper party of the contract violation.

Options:

a. is not protected by the whistleblower statute because she failed to inform the proper party of the contract violation.

b. is protected by the whistleblower statute in her state because she spoke up about her employer's actions.

c. will be reinstated to her former job, because when she told the courier of the problem she was merely exercising her first amendment right to free speech.

d. is not protected by the state whistleblower statute. it is inapplicable because the contract was with the federal government.

Explanation: The Whistleblower Protection Act protects employees and applicants of federal agencies or an organization in a contract with the Federal government who provide information about the wrongdoings in their place of work. Such wrongs might be related to abuse of power, illegal actions or mismanagement.

For a whistleblower to be protected from retaliation from their employer such as unlawful dismissal as is the case above they must have experienced the wrongdoing first-hand, disclosed it to the right authority and the person who took an action against the whistleblower must have known about the disclosure.

Erin did not disclose it to the right authority, so she will not be protected by the Act.

You might be interested in
What does the author mean when she writes that Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s “declaration has yet to be fully realized”?
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

i have he same question, we might be in the same class fr

our teacher name start with a t lol

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What were some ways California changed as a result of gold rush?
Pavlova-9 [17]
Its b i hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1872, Susan B. Anthony broke the law by voting. Why did Anthony choose to break the law?​
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

Susan B Anthony broke the law in the name of freedom.

Explanation:

She placed her vote. Women were not allowed to vote, and she refused to pay the fine.

7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the accounts of fannie lou hamer and anne moody.
elena-s [515]

Answer:

Check Explanation.

Explanation:

Fannie Lou Hamer was an activist and was born in the year 1917, she died in the year 1977. Anne moody was an author (she was the one that wrote " The coming of age in Mississippi'' and an activist. Anne moody was born on the 15th day of September, 1940 and died on the 5th of February, In the year 2015.

Both Fannie Lou Hamer and Anne moody were activists that were discriminated because of the colour of their skin(that is race) because they are both African-Americans and they both fought for equality.

The difference between Fannie Lou Hamer and Anne moody was that Fannie Lou Hamer campaigned against race discrimination by using political means such as registration of voters and she belonged to Freedom democratic party WHILE Anne moody was much more of an author and civil Rights activist which is not attached to any political party.

4 0
3 years ago
What could Great Britain have done to avoid the terrible violence that
marusya05 [52]

Answer: They could have addressed those concerns and could have granted more sovereignty to the colonies and thereby easily averted the conflict. Granting the colonies some form of meaningful representation in London and changing those policies that the Americans resented would have placated many reluctant revolutionaries and defused the most ambitious proponents of independence.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who inspired Indian leader Chandragupta Maurya to unify India for the first time?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the source of Florence’s wealth and power?
    9·2 answers
  • What was the 10 percent plan
    10·1 answer
  • In what principles did the government of providence differ from that of massachusetts
    14·1 answer
  • Did the colonists benefit from the English Bill of Rights? Why?
    14·1 answer
  • FIVE FACTS ABOUT ANCIENT SUMMER?
    7·2 answers
  • Think about the text The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare to answer question 7, Drag to arrange each incident
    12·1 answer
  • What was a baron in the French Revolution?
    9·2 answers
  • PLESSS IM BEGGING FOR HELP PLES DONTMAKE ME SUFUR WITH A LINK PLES PLESS PLESS HELP MEPLES
    13·1 answer
  • Jesus is the Redeemer promised in:
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!