Hello there,
(1) $7934.37
interest would be $2934.37
(2) $2593.74
interest would be $1593.74
(3) $1469.33
interest would be $469.33
(4) $1296.87
interest would be $796.87
(5) $239.66
interest would be $139.66
(6) $4660.96
interest would be $3660.96
Hope I Helped!
-Char
Collin's sampling method will better represent the entire population.
<h3>Missing part of the question</h3>
Determine which sampling method will better represent the entire population.
<h3>How to determine the better method?</h3>
From the question, we understand the Collin selected random names from the school directory.
While Karl surveyed only the students sitting close to him.
Karl's method is biased because students sitting far from him do not have a chance of being surveyed.
Hence, Collin's sampling method will better represent the entire population.
Read more about sampling method at:
brainly.com/question/16587013
#SPJ1
Step-by-step explanation:
1) 2x+3y-3y=1-3y. -x+2y= -4
2x/2=1-3y/2. -(1-3y/2)=-4
x=1-3y/2. -1+3y/2= -4
x=1-3(-2)/2 3y/2= -4+1
x=1+6/2 3y/2×2/3= -3×2/3
x=7/2 y= -2
S.s{ 7/3,-2}
2). -4x-6y+6y=7-6y. 4x+y= -2
-4x/-4=7-6y/-4. 4(-7-6y/4)+y= -2
x= -7-6y/4. -7-6y+y = -2
x= -7-6/4 -5y/5= 5/5
x=-13/4 y= 1
S.s { -13/4, 1 }
Answer:
The slinky situation
Step-by-step explanation:
To make a rate, divide one value by the other.
For the short bungee,
6 inches ÷ 3 pound = 2 inches per pound
While the slinky,
36 inches (remember to convert feet to inches) ÷ 1 pound = 36 inches per pound
As you can tell by the numbers, 36 inches per pound is way better than the 2 inches per pound.
