Answer:
How can inductive reason and deductive reason be thought of as opposites? ... It's important to be able to analyze the reasoning an argument in a public speech has been based on because it's important to know whether their reasoning was entirely logical or entirely illogical.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The narrator talks about how the fire wasting a man that was tied to a stake. Assuming that the fire is symbolic for fate, it makes sense for this passage to describe parraylissis. Especially when looking in the context of the last sentence, describing the man as a "unalterable mold" "made of solid bronze" someone who is unaltered is unable to move, and solid bronze is unmovable by human hands after a certain amount is gathered. I was debating between A and D though, so I'll tell you why I didn't pick D. d refers to nature and mans lack of ability to change it, however where nature is involved in the passage (fire) the man doesn't try to shape or change it, it changes the man.
Answer:
The sense of flow comes from her word choice by using a complex chemical break down relating to cleaning, the old fashion style of drying clothes, the house/residency was near or by surrounding fields, this allows me to picture and visualizes how her living is with the pass along and seemingly strong tradition.
I visualize the author is describing her childhood in the location of dutch fields. Watching maybe a parent doing cleaning or up keeping due to the mention of cleaning products and old style of drying clothes possibly from the clothespins. The family passes many traditions down and only does it their way, showing a possibility of a strong family culture or lifestyle with hints of religous manners with the phrase of "10 verses that I can say myself" connecting it to knowledge of Christianity/Catholicism.
I'm sorry if this isn't the best answer but here's at least a baseline you could go off of. I hope this helps in one way or another!
JULIET SAYS SHE LOVES ROMEO
Answer:
This would be a simile; Lennie is almost like a puppy (which would translate to child-like) in his innocence.
Explanation:
