1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marin [14]
4 years ago
8

What cultural information does the architecture of Machu Picchu provide? The Inca conquered the native peoples of the mountains.

Inca rulers relied on forced labor to build grand cities. Inca society revolved around religion and the emperor. The Inca were organized to achieve complex projects.
History
2 answers:
Anna35 [415]4 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is D) the Inca were organized to achieve complex projects.

<em>The cultural information that the architecture of Machu Picchu provides is that the Inca were organized to achieve complex projects.</em>

The Inca were a smart civilization in what today is Peru, in South America. They had pre-Columbian architectonic projects that astound modern architects for the complexity they had and the irregular land over where they built their cities like Machu Picchu, at the top of a mountain. They built complex stone structures with a uniform design for homes and public buildings. Historians consider that the Incas were organized to achieve complex projects not only in architecture but in farming. They had good farming techniques despite growing crops at the tip of the mountains and slopes.

taurus [48]4 years ago
3 0
The answer to this question is:

The cultural information that the architecture of Machu Picchu provide is....."The Inca were organized to achieve complex projects"

Hope this help, Isabelarderi
Your Welcome :)
You might be interested in
Where did John Wilkes booth shoot Abraham Lincoln
Galina-37 [17]
John Wilkes booth shot Abraham Lincoln in his head.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"In the late 1800s and early 1900s the federal government supported the efforts of the labor movement."
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

The Pullman Strike and Loewe Vs Lawlor

Explanation:

The Pullman Strike was an organised strike by the American Railway Union against the Pullman Company. The strike closed off many of the nations railroad traffic. Workers of the Pullman company had gone on strike in response to a reduction in wages and when this was unsuccessful, they increased their efforts and with the help of the AFU took it nationwide. They refused to couple or move any train that carried a Pullman car. At its peak the strike included  250,000 workers in 27 states.The federal government's response was to obtain an injunction against the union and to order them to stop interfering with trains. When they refused, President Cleveland sent in the army to stop strikers from interfering with the trains. Violence broke out and the strike collapsed. The leaders were sentenced to prison and the ARU dissolved.

Loewe V Lawlor was a Supreme Court decision that went against the rights of the labour movement. D. E. Loewe & Company had been subjected to a strike and a boycott as a result of it becoming an 'open shop'. The nationwide boycott was supported by the American Federation of Labor and persuaded retailers, wholesalers and customers not to buy from Loewe. This boycott cost him a large amount of money and he sued the union for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act (Another piece of legislation subsequently used to attack unions).

The case was sent to the US Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, which found that the lawsuit was out of the scope of the Sherman Act. However, upon appeal it then went to the Supreme Court, who ruled in favour of Loewe. The courts decision was important for two reasons. Firstly it allowed individual unionists to be held personally responsible for damages arising from the activities of their unions. Secondly, it effectively outlawed secondary boycott (Where members of different companies boycott in solidarity with the affected workers) as a violation of the Sherman Act. Both of these limited the ability of the unions to bring about change through striking and boycott.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13463190#readmore

3 0
3 years ago
Why was there a wave of immigration from Northern Europe to the United States? How did this movement affect the number size
slega [8]

Answer:

Most Southern European immigrants were motivated by economic opportunity in the United States, while Eastern Europeans (primarily Jews) fled religious persecution.

Explanation:

this was a problum because it caused over population and overcrouding and closed a whole lot of job closeing and finacial overload money culd not keep up with the population

8 0
3 years ago
What role did Marquis de LaFayette play in the American Revolution?
nordsb [41]

Marie-Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette (French pronunciation: ​[maʁki də la fajɛt]; 6 September 1757 – 20 May 1834), in the United States often known simply as Lafayette, was a French aristocrat and military officer who fought in the American Revolutionary War. A close friend of George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and Thomas Jefferson, Lafayette was a key figure in the French Revolution of 1789 and the July Revolution of 1830.

Born in Chavaniac, in the province of Auvergne in south central France, Lafayette came from a wealthy landowning family. He followed its martial tradition, and was commissioned an officer at age 13. He became convinced that the American cause in its revolutionary war was noble, and traveled to the New World seeking glory in it. There, he was made a major general; however, the 19-year-old was initially not given troops to command. Wounded during the Battle of Brandywine, he still managed to organize an orderly retreat. He served with distinction in the Battle of Rhode Island. In the middle of the war, he returned home to lobby for an increase in French support. He again sailed to America in 1780, and was given senior positions in the Continental Army. In 1781, troops in Virginia under his command blocked forces led by Cornwallis until other American and French forces could position themselves for the decisive Siege of Yorktown.

Lafayette returned to France, and in 1787 was appointed to the Assembly of Notables, which was convened in response to the fiscal crisis. He was elected a member of the Estates-General of 1789, where representatives met from the three traditional orders of French society—the clergy, the nobility, and the commoners. He helped write the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, with Thomas Jefferson's assistance; this document sought to establish the universal rights of all men. In keeping with this philosophy, Lafayette advocated for the end of slavery. After the storming of the Bastille, Lafayette was appointed commander-in-chief of the National Guard and tried to steer a middle course through the French Revolution. In August 1792, the radical factions ordered his arrest. Fleeing through the Austrian Netherlands, he was captured by Austrian troops and spent more than five years in prison.

Lafayette returned to France after Napoleon Bonaparte secured his release in 1797, though he refused to participate in Napoleon's government. After the Bourbon Restoration of 1814, he became a liberal member of the Chamber of Deputies, a position he held for most of the remainder of his life. In 1824, President James Monroe invited Lafayette to the United States as the nation's guest; during the trip, he visited all twenty-four states in the union at the time, meeting a rapturous reception. During France's July Revolution of 1830, Lafayette declined an offer to become the French dictator. Instead, he supported Louis-Philippe as king, but turned against him when the monarch became autocratic. Lafayette died on 20 May 1834, and is buried in Picpus Cemetery in Paris, under soil from Bunker Hill. For his accomplishments in the service of both France and the United States, he is sometimes known as "The Hero of the Two Worlds".

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is Christopher Columbus a good guy or a bad guy? Explain with details and at least 3 reasons to support your evidence. Thanks!
Anni [7]
The use of good guy or bad guy for a person doesn't make much sense.

I'll just list some major facts about Columbus and let you make your own conclusions.

Christopher Columbus believed the world was round. Others during his time didn't believe so. Columbus also thought that the world was smaller than what it actually is, principally because North America and South America were not yet discovered. Columbus went to many people and asked them to fund him, and finally the King and Queen of Spain funded him. When Columbus reached the Americas, he treated the natives harshly. He took their wealth, such as gold, etc, and made the natives slaves. And he brought back the riches of the Caribbean to Spain. Columbus never knew that he had stumbled across an undiscovered land, and instead thought he had reached India, where he was originally going for, and so he called the natives "Indians."

Hope that helped :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When was botticelli born
    7·2 answers
  • What was one of the primary goals for President Lincoln and the Republicans in proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constit
    11·1 answer
  • However the colonists forced to Penn to agree that only the
    5·1 answer
  • One way the constitution limits the powers of government is to
    15·1 answer
  • A neighbor has just passed the exam to become a teacher. He has applied for his teaching license and has not received it. What l
    12·1 answer
  • WHY DOES THE TEXAS REVOLUTION MATTERS NOW?
    9·1 answer
  • The Road Not Taken
    11·1 answer
  • What aspects of the Ottoman Empire in 1750 seem unique, and what aspects seem to be part of a wider global pattern
    7·1 answer
  • HELP ILL GIVE A BRAINIEST
    15·2 answers
  • Which was not true of the early Christian Church?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!