The 3.1 °F/min rate of change of the temperature and 15 minutes change duration gives the change in temperature as 46.5 °F
<h3>How can the change in temperature be found from the rate of change?</h3>
The rate at which the temperature changed = 3.1 °F/min
The duration of the change in temperature = 15 minutes
The relationship between the change in temperature, the rate of change in temperature and the time can be presented as follows;
Where;
∆T = The required change in temperature
∆t = The duration of the change = 15 minutes
Which gives;
∆T = 3.1°F/min × 15 minutes = 46.5 °F
- The change in temperature, ∆T = 46.5 °F
Learn more about the rate of change of a variable here:
brainly.com/question/10208814
#SPJ1
Answer:
Therefore, the probability that at least half of them need to wait more than 10 minutes is <em>0.0031</em>.
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for the probability of an exponential distribution is:
P(x < b) = 1 - e^(b/3)
Using the complement rule, we can determine the probability of a customer having to wait more than 10 minutes, by:
p = P(x > 10)
= 1 - P(x < 10)
= 1 - (1 - e^(-10/10) )
= e⁻¹
= 0.3679
The z-score is the difference in sample size and the population mean, divided by the standard deviation:
z = (p' - p) / √[p(1 - p) / n]
= (0.5 - 0.3679) / √[0.3679(1 - 0.3679) / 100)]
= 2.7393
Therefore, using the probability table, you find that the corresponding probability is:
P(p' ≥ 0.5) = P(z > 2.7393)
<em>P(p' ≥ 0.5) = 0.0031</em>
<em></em>
Therefore, the probability that at least half of them need to wait more than 10 minutes is <em>0.0031</em>.
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
<h2>
Step-by-step explanation:</h2>
The origin of the coordinate system is the center of the circle. So we have an angle that measures 
. so the x-coordinate and y-coordinate can be found, by using trigonometry as follows:
Finally, the exact value of the position of the rider after the carousel rotates 
radians is:
Step-by-step explanation:
I=PRT/100
p=I/RT×100
p=2240/10×2×100
p=11200
Answer:
I believe it’s the 3rd one.
Explanation:
It’s the only graph where it looks like (2.5,5) was graphed.
