HELP ASAP!!!! 50 points!!

Biology

1 answer:

Flura [38]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

It could be argued that there is a separate force acting upon the investigation. Or that the room is invalidating the results for some reason. Or that an error was made in measurement.

There are a thousand and one ways to try to dispute an investigation like this. However, for every argument that can oppose it, a counterargument can easily be made.

For instance, controlling the variables invalidates about 90% of any possible claims to the contrary. The majority of arguments would stem from the fact that it is nearly impossible to completely prove something in fear of external factors. The solution? Control the external factors.

So, in conclusion, a person could dispute the results of the investigation by claiming that something invisible like magnetics could not possibly be proven to exist, because there are all sorts of things that could be influencing the investigation. The way to counter the argument would be to prove yourself that the environment is controlled, and that nothing could be influencing the investigation.

You might be interested in

The full extent of my __________ skill is preparing scrambled eggs on toast.

olga nikolaevna [1]

The answer is culinary. Hope this helps.

3 0

3 years ago

When does mRNA editing take place?

Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

After transcription, some RNA molecules are altered to contain bases not encoded in the genome. Most often this involves the editing or modification of one base to another, but in some organisms can involve the insertion or deletion of a base. Such editing events alter the coding properties of mRNA.

Explanation:

hope it helps you

mark me as brainliest!!

5 0

3 years ago

With this type of reproduction, normally you would have more variety amongst the

lora16 [44]

Answer:

Explanation:

no, make sure you say thank you to me for helping

7 0

2 years ago

Explain biodiversity

koban [17]

The variety of all life forms on Earth.

6 0

3 years ago

C. Which ecosystem would be able to survive a disease better? Why

mart [117]

Forests would be able to survive a disease better.

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

Many studies have taken place for many years to determine what type of ecosystem can best survive diseases effectively. A recent study has concluded that the forests are the viable ecosystem which can survive a disease better then any other ecosystem; followed by grasslands as the second best.

The study states that the chances of forests are better as the ecosystem contains many different species of trees and plants. The mix of several species in an ecosystem helps in surviving climate changes, pests and severe diseases. According to the study, the diversity of different biological species have a better rate of production than an environment which has only one species in it. The biodiversity will help produce the amount of energy that would best suit the needs of population.

7 0

3 years ago