Answer: Reasonable person standard
Explanation:
Reasonable person standard can be defined as one that meets what society expects. This does not mean that the person must be perfect but they behave should be according to the situations that can occuir in the daily life. An example of this would be a person who is driving, when the red signal appears in the traffic light the person knows it has to stop.
The reasonable person has a duty and is to comply with the laws of society. Laws do not vary according to the person, each human being has a responsability to society and must comply with ut. The person must be aware of how its actions affects others, which could positively or negativily. It is important the the citizen kept informed because that will help it to know how to act.
Answer:
The excerpt informs the reader that there were likely inaccuracies in the report provided to the court.
Explanation:
The above statement most appropriately relates that how the author's purpose of the given frame and the excerpt are distinct. It reveals that 'the excerpt aims to inform the readers about the imprecision involved in the report that was presented to the court' as the report says 'Faryad had pellets in his left arm' which is logically false if he was sitting on the bicycle with Iqbal who had in the right side and hence, the frame asserts a different story. That's how both are different from each other.
Answer:
Nirvana.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, the Nirvana is an unchanging, peaceful state of mind that allows us freedom from the illusion of individuality and the limitations of the self. This state is the goal of Buddhism, which means to blow out, to leave individualitiy, leave the self, and achieve a rebirth, another state of mind.
causes and values for example let's look at environmental interest groups. what actually promote is the values of nature's well being and they fight to protect it from any potential harm such as carbon emission or unresponsible forest harvesting
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the one potential counterclaim would be that some types of cancers usually take twenty to thirty years to develop, and cell phone studies have only been monitoring this potential connection for ten years or less. Therefore there is not enough scientific evidence that has been gathered yet to support these claims.