Answer:
B. The frame is people who play video games
Explanation:
into a survey it its neccesary to delimit people according to the subject of the survey in order to get representative dates of the population, for that reason if the survey want to show the quantity of people who buy video games in a national scale, the frame of that study is people who play video games, in this order of ideas, people who don't play videogames, don't like videogames and don't have the adquisitive power to buy video games would be excluded from the survey, however, if the pollster doesn't take into account the previous affirmations, the survey won't be conclusive, reaslistic and useless for showing the quantity people who buy video games in the game store.
Answer:
check explanation
Explanation:
SORRY! I COULDN'T FIND A, SOMEONE ELSE COULD! BEST OF LUCK :)
B. Anne Frank received her first red checked diary. A similar diary was laid on the table alongside her other gifts, a blue blouse, cold cream, and a book.
C. Anne Frank and her family were sent to the Auschwitz-Birkenau extermination and concentration camp complex in German-occupied Poland.
Answer:
25v²
Explanation:
The kinetic energy in joules of a 50-kilogram runner running at v meters per second is modeled by the equation
Solution:
Kinetic energy is the energy of a body due to its motion. The kinetic energy of a body is maintained until there is a change in velocity. Kinetic energy can also be defined as the work done in accelerating a body from rest to a specified velocity. The SI unit is in Joules (J)
The formula for kinetic energy is:
K.E = (1/2)mv²
where m is the mass of the object and v is the velocity of the object.
Given that m = 50 kg and v = v, hence:
K.E = (1/2) * 50 * v² = 25v²
K.E = 25v²
The correct answer is social theory
Social theory is the best structure we have for think about these relationships.
Social theorists, therefore, ask the big questions and return to them repeatedly, in different ways, in successive generations. The history of social theory comes closer of the history of philosophy than of a history of science, presenting it as a succession of “discoveries”.
