I think c but it might be very wrong
Allowing free elections in eastern europe.
Dear Editor of the Los Angeles Times,Hello. I am a white American citizen living in Los Angeles. I have just read about theSupreme Court case of Korematsu v. the United States, and had some opinions I would like todiscuss. This case as made me very irate as I do not agree with the way Japanese Americansare being treated.I believe that forcing Japanese Americans into internment camps is unfair andunconstitutional. It is bypassing their rights as American citizens. Yes, they are of Japanesedissent, but they chose to be here. They left their home country, culture, family, and basicallyeverything they knew behind just to become citizens in this country. They want nothing morethan to take advantage of all this great land has to offer, just like everyone else. It is unfair todiscriminate against them because of their nationality. Korematsu should not have beenarrested for resisting containment, as freedom is a founding principal of the United States. Iagree with the dissenting opinion, as the majority voted to withhold Korematsu’s conviction
Answer:
Law of April 6, 1830.
Explanation:
Manuel de Mier y Teran was a Mexican General who issued a report to the government in 1829. In his report, he initialized that slavery should be prohibited and this policy also called to close the borders to forbid any Americans come into the borders of Texas.
He outlined many recommendations in his report, of which many recommendations were adopted into the law under the Law of April 6, 1830. The laws were passed under the Presidentship of Anastasio Bustamante.
Therefore, the correct answer is Law of April 6, 1830.
B.......since he was the head of the house of Lancaster in the War of the Roses; defeated Richard III at Bosworth Field and was proclaimed king; married the daughter of Edward IV and so united the houses of York and Lancaster.