Answer: Option (D)
Explanation:
From the given case or scenario, we can state that since there are no additional changes are made then the following statement in accordance with the review of revised protocol is correct, i.e. Unless or until nature of these questions would tend to keep the scale of the risk to mere more than the minimal for the adolescents, then the research would be more likely to still qualify for the expedited review.
Answer:
One difference between consensus and conflict theories are that consensus emphasises harmony, integration and stability within society. Conflict theories, however, stress conflict, struggle and change. ... This is shared values which are agreed upon by society as a whole. Whereas, conflict theorists do not believe this
Explanation:
Explanation:
A special election would be held when something arises that does not arise on a regular basis or routine. For instance, if an elected-office suddenly becomes vacant or a legislature wants to put a referendum before the voters, then they can use a special election.
Answer:
A. Increase awareness of the differences in discourse conventions across different groups
Explanation:
According to the Gumperz reading and the video ‘Crosstalk’, the best way to address cross-cultural miscommunication is to <em>increase awareness of the differences in discourse conventions across different groups. </em>Gumpertz was a linguist who studied socio-linguistic and called it ethnography of communication. He studied the variation of discourse in different speech communities. The culture of the interlocutors affected both the discourse and meaning.
Answer: The unintended, undesirable effect is morally tolerable if it brings a good result.
Explanation: The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm.
According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end.
