Though both Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X both
worked on the goal of helping blacks in their struggle for civil rights in the United States in the 1960s,
their approach and speech was very different.
Martin was more conciliatory in his approach. He used peaceful methods and often
incorporated the teachings of the Bible.
He wanted blacks and whites to coexist with each other. Malcolm on the other hand, was very
aggressive in his approach. He was not
afraid to lash out at what he viewed was the unfair treatment that blacks were
given and encourage violent means to achieve that goal.
Answer: Historiography for the Purpose of Nationalism.
Explanation:
The emergence of nationalism in a world dating back to the late eighteenth century. Get your full swing in the next two. Nationalism is reflected through all pores of political, social and scientific life. The emergence of nationalism also reflected on historiography.
Many historians have been encouraged by nationalism. Many of these works have emerged as a result of these tendencies. It is often a syndrome of lesser value because myths characterize most of these historical works. Their scientific value is also called into question. The historian must be objective when writing. The question is, where does this phenomenon come from? Nationalism in historiography seeks to portray, one national entity as larger than another. That is, to minorize another. A patriot historian can be objective, unlike a nationalist.
Passed by Congress in an attempt to impose upon tribal governments certain restrictions and protections afforded by the U.S. Constitution. This represented a significant<span>intrusion by the federal government into the internal affairs of tribes.</span>
The answer is C. Ming dynasty
