1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
daser333 [38]
3 years ago
6

Why are large empires hard to maintain

History
1 answer:
Lilit [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Typically, any political system (empire or not) eventually collapses, which several people explained below but without answer the question. There are several reasons for this, though this is probably not an exhaustive list.

1). Most empires, regardless of the tribute system supporting them, were agriculturally reliant. Through most of human history, there have been numerous bad harvests which promote plagues and movements of large numbers of people from agricultural production. Very few political systems of a complex nature can survive these problems. This is well-detailed in the monograph Plagues and Peoples by William H. McNeil.

2). Empires invariably seem to reach a state of stagnation where their political leaders become complacent and reliant upon their previous successes and prior strategies for dealing with problems. In Arnold Toynbee’s classic work A Study of History, he strongly makes the argument that its this inflexibility and complacency that causes empires to fall to their neighbors eventually, or to a new dynasty that is more willing to be innovative in finding solutions to the problems that beset the polity. Often this stagnation results in a failure to adapt the economy or distribution of resources in a way that will maintain the empire. We see this is in the debasement of the Roman currency, its over-reliance on foreign military forces, and its over-expansion. The Romans failed to adapt successfully as their world changed and empire expanded.

3). Since you ask specifically about empires, the greatest challenge for many empires is multi-culturalism. Several empires have failed due to an inability to maintain proper respect for the various cultures within that empire. We see this with the fall of the Assyrian Empire, destroyed due to its disrespect for and brutality against subject peoples, and with the fall of the Ming dynasty to the Qing who brought the grievances of an ethnic minority into an alliance with Han Chinese elements who had lost their loyalty to the Ming.

4). Sometimes empires over-expand as well. The collapse of the British Empire and the conquests of Alexander the Great could be attributed to this as well. Both these empires took on more territory than they could control effectively, with Alexander managing to himself following his soldiers desire to cease and return home and the British Empire failing to address issues of multiculturalism with its efforts to maintain hegemonic control requiring a vast expenditure of wealth and resources which the British population was no longer willing to provide following WWII

Explanation:

You might be interested in
German philosopher Karl Marx developed the theory known as communism where
Readme [11.4K]
Workers would violently overthrow the capitalist system and create a new society where the means of production and distribution are shared among all
6 0
3 years ago
Which number represents the country of Australia?
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

2 aka B

Explanation:

That's Australia

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe u.s. policy toward Iraq during bill Clinton’s presidency
Jet001 [13]

Answer:

U.S. policy toward the region of the Persian Gulf has changed more and more often over the years more than any other foreign policy I can think of. Current U.S. policy can be traced back more than half a century. This said, the most useful place to begin to understand how we arrived where we are today is to return to the late 1960s, when Great Britain decided it could no longer sustain its commitments east of Suez.

Explanation:

Changes

5 0
3 years ago
Who opposed ratifying the constitution? What was their major argument against ratification?
kenny6666 [7]
The Federalist. The major argument is the constitution gave too much power to the government
6 0
3 years ago
US Secretary of State John Hay established the policy, which opened China’s ports to European trade.
Montano1993 [528]
The policy is known as the "Open Door Policy."

John Hay created this idea in hopes that America and countries all over Europe could trade peacefully with China. This concept was developed in order to protect America's trade interests while also ensuring that no other country would establish a monopoly on trade with China. Within this policy, all countries would agree not to interfere with another country's trade with China.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • HELP PLS!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Why were asian spices in the 1300s so expensive by the time they reached Europe
    11·1 answer
  • In economics, all goods and services that exist must be made by which of the
    14·1 answer
  • The Sumerians, Akkadians, and Persians are all __________________. a. examples of civilizations in the Arabian Peninsula region
    7·2 answers
  • The Soviet Union was made of 15 states. Of them, was considered the most powerful.
    9·1 answer
  • What was the four features of missouri compromise?
    5·1 answer
  • What were the three outstanding events in 1619 that had a great influence on the colonies?
    15·1 answer
  • PLS HELP.
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Dr. Fauci do
    13·1 answer
  • In what two industries did Asian immigrants find work?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!