All categories

3 years ago

What is the main difference between the natural hazards disclosure statement and the real property transfer disclosure statement

Business

1 answer:

fenix001 [56]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

the transfer disclosure statement is limited to information that the seller has, while the natural hazards disclosure requires additional research

Explanation:

Both of these statements are prepared by the seller. The transfer disclosure statement has requirement for just declaration of obvious latent defects. It is limited to information that the seller has, while the natural hazards disclosure statement requires divulging if the property is in a zone known to be risky based on government maps. Therefore it requires additional research.

You might be interested in

Which economic policy was most successful during the Great Depression?

labwork [276]

The economic policy that was most successful during the Great Depression is (D) increased government spending. It is a common view among economists that government spending on the war at least accelerated from the recovery of the Great Depression. Well, as always, other think that it didn't play a vital role in recovery.

6 0

3 years ago

The adult education director at st. francis hospital uses ________ to evaluate the interactions of variables that contribute to

Harlamova29_29 [7]

At the Saint Francis Hospital, an adult education director uses What-if analysis to evaluate the interactions of variables that contribute to the profitability of various potential seminars. A What-If Analysis is the process of altering the values in cells to see how those changes will affect the outcome of formulas on the worksheet.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is the kind of decision that can be made at the margin?

Alexxx [7]

I think it would be b cause when the work is done you cant hire new workers to do what is already done

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In which of these instances is demand said to be perfectly inelastic?

Murljashka [212]

Answer:

b. A decrease in price of 2% causes an increase in quantity demanded of 0%.

Explanation:

By definition, the demand is said to be <em>perfectly inelastic</em> when no matter how much the price of a good changes, you will still be consuming the same exact amount as you did before the price changed.

Keeping this in mind, we know that the price may increase or decrease in 2%, but the demanded quantity will not have any change at all (people won't consume less or more).

So, now we know that the correct answer is <em>b, </em>because a decrease in price of 2% causes an increase in quantity demanded of 0% - in other words, people's purchase decision weren't influenced by the change in the price.

5 0

3 years ago

Freese Inc. sells a product for 650 per unit. The variable cost is 455 per unit, while fixed costs are 4,290,000. Determine (a)

Dvinal [7]

Answer:

Instructions are below.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Freese Inc. sells a product for 650 per unit. The variable cost is 455 per unit, while fixed costs are 4,290,000.

A) To calculate the break-even point both in units and dollars, we need to use the following formulas:

Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per unit

Break-even point in units= 4,290,000/ (650 - 455)

Break-even point in units= 22,000 units

Break-even point (dollars)= fixed costs/ contribution margin ratio

Break-even point (dollars)= 4,290,000/ (195/650)

Break-even point (dollars)= $14,300,000

B) Now for a selling price of $655:

Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per unit

Break-even point in units= 4,290,000/ (655 - 455)

Break-even point in units= 21,450 units

Break-even point (dollars)= fixed costs/ contribution margin ratio

Break-even point (dollars)= 4,290,000/ (200/655)

Break-even point (dollars)= $14,049,750

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers