Since you haven't provided the data to answer the problem, I have my notes here that might guide you solve the problem on your own:
Now, consider a triangle that’s graphed in the coordinate plane. You can always use the distance formula, find the lengths of the three sides, and then apply Heron’s formula. But there’s an even better choice, based on the determinant of a matrix.
Here’s a formula to use, based on the counterclockwise entry of the coordinates of the vertices of the triangle
(x1<span>, </span>y1), (x2<span>, </span>y2), (x3<span>, </span>y3<span>) or (2, 1), (8, 9), (1, 8): </span>A<span> = </span>x1y2<span> + </span>x2y3<span> + </span>x3y1<span> – </span>x1y3<span> – </span>x2y1<span> – </span>x3y2<span>.</span>
Answer:
48 metres.
Step-by-step explanation:
How far does the cyclist travel in 3 seconds:
First, find how far the cyclist goes in 1 second:
320 metres = 20 seconds
? = 1 second
320 ÷ 20 = 16 metres
The cyclist travels 16 metres in 1 second.
How far does the cyclist travel in 3 seconds:
1 second = 16 metres
3 seconds = ?
16 × 3 = 48 metres.
The cyclist travels 48 metres in 3 seconds.
Answer:
1) p1=0.83
2) p2=0.81
3) Option B
4) p=0.82
5) s=0.03
6) z=0.67
7) P=0.50
8) Do not reject H0
Step-by-step explanation:
1) The proportion of Republicans who think the full-body scans should be applied in airports is equal to the ratio between the republicans that think it should over the total Republicans in the poll:
2) The proportion of Democrats who think the full-body scans should be applied in airports is equal to:
3) As we want to know if there is a difference in the proportions calculated, not if one is higher or lower than the other, the correct option is B:
4) The pooled estimate of a proportion is the average of both proportions:
5) The standard error can be calculated as:
6) The z-statistic can be calculated as:
7) The P-value for z=0.67 is P=0.50 (from the standard normal distribution table).
8) If the significance level is 0.01, the P-value is bigger than the significance level. The effect is not significanct. The null hypothesis is not rejected.
There is not enough evidence to say that both proportions are different.
A. Do not reject H0
Answer:3.5s2
Step-by-step explanation:
because I said so