<h3>
Answer: Everything but the lower right hand corner</h3>
==============================
Explanation:
Notice for the corners mentioned, we have the figures with corresponding angles that are the same (shown by similar arc markings) and they have congruent corresponding sides as well (aka they are the same length shown by similar tickmarks). Rotating one figure has it transform into the other.
The only time this does not happen is with the pair of figures in the bottom right hand corner. One square has side lengths of 20, the other has side lengths of 25. The two figures are not congruent due to the side mismatch.
The answer is A
start by isolating the y variable
the rest of the work is shown here
Answer:
I dont see where you said its shown below..repost please =)
You can find counterexamples to disprove this claim. We have positive integers that are perfect square numbers; when we take the square root of those numbers, we get an integer.
For example, the square root of 1 is 1, which is an integer. So if y = 1, then the denominator becomes an integer and thus we get a quotient of two integers (since x is also defined to be an integer), the definition of a rational number.
Example: x = 2, y = 1 ends up with
which is rational. This goes against the claim that
is always irrational for positive integers x and y.
Any integer y that is a perfect square will work to disprove this claim, e.g. y = 1, y = 4, y= 9, y = 16. So it is not always irrational.
Answer:
Part a) <1=72°
Part b) <2=108°
Part c) <3=72°
Part d) <4=108°
Step-by-step explanation:
step 1
Find the measure of angle 1
we know that
<1+108°=180° -----> by supplementary angles
so
<1=180°-108°=72°
step 2
Find the measure angle 2
we know that
<2=108° -----> by corresponding angles
step 3
Find the measure angle 3
we know that
<3=<1-----> by corresponding angles
so
<3=72°
step 4
Find the measure angle 4
we know that
<4=108° -----> by alternate exterior angles