A generalist species is able to survive in a wide variety of environmental conditions and can make use of lots of different resources. Generalist species have a big niche. Humans, rabbits, house flies, and raccoons would all fall under the generalist species list.
A specialist species can only thrive is a small variety of environmental conditions and/or only has a limited diet. Specialist species have a small niche. Pandas, koalas, and salamanders would all fall under the specialist species list.
I believe another term for Natural Selection, based off of the answers provided, I would say C, Survival of the Fittest.
Answer:
A: Suited for their environment
Explanation:
You can automatically eliminate B and C, since they both say that animals with adaptations that won't work with their environment would have a higher survival rate. This doesn't make sense; adaptations that wouldn't suit an environment would actually lower the population's chances of reproduction and survival.
That leads us to A and D. However, A would be the correct answer. Organisms with adaptations that suited their environment would help them (since it would make the organism more compatible with their environment), rather than having no change at all.
Hope this helped!
hjjbhhuyggtreeszxbnmplnbuutedccvgygfftfcfffcfggghhubvfcvvggvghdebijnihgvinbvcdefbiknbjhhhggcccggvb
hchhchchfhcbxbxkodemeururyxbcnkfofnfnfbchgbghjfnfhfhcbfhcbcjdnxnxjcjjcncjxhdu
I would say A. Quantitative data involves numbers and stuff like that. Unlike qualitative data, which involves pictures and not numerical data. I hope this helped.
