I think it is reasonable. She will have extra cash (almost $500) but that isn't a bad thing when you are going on a vacation.
If you need to know how to do it, what I did was take the $48 and the 52 weeks and multiply them together to get $2,496.... But if you think in your own opinion it's not reasonable than say she could trim down her savings and only try to earn about 40 dollars each week; you get to the closer amount of $2,000 with $2,080...
I hope this helps. Choose for yourself though! <3 Good luck! (:
This can happen if you add another independent variable to your regression model that is strongly correlated to some other variable already in the model.
This is called multicollinearity.
If there is a high correlation between your independent variables can lead to problems.
<span>It can lead to increased variance of the coefficient estimates and make the estimates very sensitive to minor changes in the model.</span>
Answer:5 there is no and
6 is not definite
7 yes
Step-by-step explanation:in 6 they can't multiply
7 they are lnverses
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Given

Required
Solve for x

Add
to both sides


Take LCM


Multiply both sides by 

Evaluate the left hand side


Divide 28 by 4

Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let b represent the the number of bagels that she could buy.
At most, she can spend $25. She will spend a total of $3.50 on cream cheese. Each bagel costs an additional $0.90. The cost of b bagels would be 0.9b. Therefore, the inequality that can be used to determine the number of bagels she could buy is
0.9b + 3.50 ≤ 25
0.9b ≤ 25 - 3.5
0.9b ≤ 21.5
Dividing through by 0.9, it becomes
0.9b/0.9 ≤ 21.5/0.9
b ≤ 23.8
The most number of bagels that she could buy is 23