Answer:
Question 1: Answer is Option A: The British finally gave India a much greater level of independence.
Question 2: Answer is Option B: British companies ignored the limits imposed by the caste system and hired laborers on the basis of merit instead
Explanation:
<u>Question 1:</u>
Indian Army played a major role in world war 1. There were around 13 lakh Indian soldiers who served during World War I and fought for the Britishers. When the World War I ended in 1919, Indians were promoted to higher officer ranks. Many cadets were also sent to study in "Great Britain" at the "Royal Military College".
<u>Question 2:</u>
As far as caste system was concerned, British served their own interests as it was very difficult for them to manage large Indian population and that to with wide variety of castes. So, they created single society with common laws so that they can easily govern them. So, they use to hire labors on the basis of merit and industrialization occurred in India.
When making an interpretation of a past event, a historian:
Analyzes existing studies related to the event to determine if they are biased.Hence option B
<h3>
What is the work of a historian? </h3>
Archival records are frequently studied and preserved by historians. By examining historical records and sources, historians conduct research, analyze, interpret, and write about the past.
The complete part of the question n is attached in the image below :
Three things that a historian does
- translate documents or seek a translation.
- editing historical texts and displays.
- assembling comprehensive data on people from credible sources in order to build biographies.
- conducting interviews to learn more about people's life experiences.
Hence, the correct option is B
Learn more about a historian's work role:
brainly.com/question/11371196
#SPJ1
In general, you can look at the Supreme court checking congress (by overturning unconstitutional laws), congress checks the president (through investigation committees, and eventually potential impeachment) and the president checks the Supreme court (by appointing justices). There are some smaller checks that run counter to this order (like the President can veto congressional bills), but they're much more minor powers. Most of the time, the "checking" of presidential power by the supreme court happens by the court striking down laws passed through congress that the president has thrown a considerable amount of political weight behind (think many of FDR's new deal programs, some of which were struck down by the court. Obamacare also narrowly had some of it's components struck down by the court). The Supreme court can strike down executive orders that are unconstitutional. President Trump's muslim ban, for instance, had some of it's elements stricken down by the court in just the last month.
<span />
