A bishop believes that "Kings on Earth should rule with God's authority," which came to be known as 'the Divine Right," or "the Divine right of kings." A French aristocrat has been born into a higher class family and/or was born to a French nobleman. This makes their belief that government rule should only be given to them or someone within their class, as they thought of themselves as the "best" candidates for ruling since they were such noble people. In conclusion, a French aristocrat would not be too happy with the beliefs of the bishop. I hope this helps you out! :)
The correct answer is C. She can deceive her participants as long as she reveals the true nature of the study at its conclusion.
Explanation:
If the research involves human subjects, there are different ethical principles the researcher should follow to guarantee voluntary participation and the protection of participants and information. One of these principles is to be completely honest about the purpose of the research and the way participants will be part of it.
However, if revealing the purpose of the research can affect participation and create bias in the research, as it occurs in the case presented, the researcher can deceive participants during the research and reveal the purpose or nature of the research at the end. In this way, the researcher is still following ethical principles but avoids bias from participants. Thus, in the case presented Dr. Ethridge "can deceive her participants as long as she reveals the true nature of the study at its conclusion" (Option C).
Answer:
a film of the French New Wave
Explanation:
Based on this description it seems that Jean Pierre is making a film of the French New Wave. This was an art film movement that emerged in the late 1950s and 60's becoming one of the most influential in cinema history. This was all due to its rejection of traditional filmmaking conventions in order to pursue more unique film methodology and experimentation. Using new approaches to editing, visual style, and narrative.
Answer:
Work-family conflict.
Explanation:
A work-family conflict can be defined as the process whereby family roles interfere with an individual's performance, commitment and responsibilities at their workplace as well as how this work affect their personal life (family) since they are required to invest time, energy and strong commitment.
Simply stated, work-family conflict are mutually incompatible because each role invariably affects the other according to Kahn et al. (1964).
Using the Greenhaus and Beutell (1985) framework, work-family conflict can be classified in to three (3) main categories, these are;
1. Behavior-based conflict: this conflict occurs when certain behaviors exhibited by an individual isn't compatible with assigned roles.
2. Strain-based conflict: it is a type of conflict that arises when stress from the performance of a role is transferred to another role, thus affecting commitment, efficiency and effectiveness.
3. Time-based conflict: it is a type of conflict that arises when a person is not able to perform other roles as a result of devotion of time to another.
In this scenario, Sherry has a meeting with her regional boss scheduled for the same time that her daughter is competing in the high school state swimming finals. These competing demands would cause a work-family conflict. <em>This is an example of a time-based ork-family conflict.</em>
