Answer:
$0
Explanation:
Since in the given situation there is a depreciation method change i.e. from the straight-line method to double-declining method so there would be no impact restrospectively.
Hence, there would be no cumulative impact as it creates the impact prospectively
So the impact would be zero
Answer:
a.38%
b. No because the margin is above the requirement at 38%
c.-150%
Explanation:
a.
1000 shares*$40 per share = 40000
margin requirement is 50% so equity = 20000
1 year later price increase to 50
$1000 shares*$50 per share = 50000
dividend = $2*1000 = 2000
margin = 20000/52000 = 38%
b.
No because the margin is above the requirement at 38%
c.
Price of 1000 stock year 1 at 50$/share = 50000
40000 – 50000 = -10000
Rate of return = (-10000 -20000)/20000 = -150%
Answer:
C. The standard of one vote for each share cannot be altered.
Explanation:
Shares are sold to individuals that now obtain ownership rights of a company.
Common share holders are entitled to voting in of new board members and also have the ability to vote for changes in bylaws of the company.
Also common shareholders are shares have different classes with different voting rights.
However it is not true that the standard of one vote for each share cannot be altered.
When more shares are issued by a company it can result in dilution of shares. That means for example if a person has 10,000 shares in a company with 1 million shares, and the company now issues an extra 1 million shares making 2 million in total now.
The shareholder's standard of vote for each share is now halved
Answer:
The journal entries are shown below:
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the journal entries for the given data are as follows:
(1). Jun.30 Bad Debt expense A/c Dr $12,800
To Allowance for Doubtful A/c $12,800
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
(2). July Allowance for Doubtful A/c Dr $6,400
To Accounts Receivable A/c $6,400
(Being the customer balance written off is recorded)