1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lara [203]
2 years ago
7

Arianna was a victim of assault when a man attempted to grab her purse on a busy street. She did not let go of the purse, and th

e man hit her to get her to release her grip. Arianna told the police everything, went to the police station to identify the man who hit her, and attended the preliminary hearing in court. The judge in the preliminary hearing set bail for the man and ordered a trial date. Arianna contacts police to find that there will not be a trial. What has MOST likely happened?
A.
The man has paid his bail and will not have to stand trial.

B.
The man made a plea bargain with the prosecutor.

C.
The man changed his plea from guilty to not guilty.

D.
The prosecutor did not think that the police had enough evidence.
Law
1 answer:
KATRIN_1 [288]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

i think it is d

Explanation:

because alot of people dont get enough evedince to go to jail

You might be interested in
Which is an example of an individual bioethical decision?
Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I think it’s right

8 0
3 years ago
How has the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment changed police policies that now mandates in domestic violence cases in Ill
bulgar [2K]

Answer:

Based on the results of the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment, which concluded that arrest was the most effective in most domestic violence cases, the Minneapolis Police Department started requiring police officials to use it as the main approach and to make a report on the reasons not to do it if they fail to do it.

Explanation:

The police policies were changed in March of 1984 and led to a record of people in jail on spouse assault charges.

4 0
3 years ago
Why do you think the Supreme Court has upheld restrictions on free speech under some circumstances, but overturned restrictions
goblinko [34]

Answer:

Perhaps to avoid people getting emotionally hurt?

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
aleksklad [387]

Answer:

In order of what you said,

1. Motion for Suppression

2. Motion for Continuance

3. Motion for Discovery

4. Motion for Bill of Particulars

Explanation:

I got this correct.

PLATO gang

7 0
3 years ago
In which of the following courts does a defendant NOT have a right to a public defender?
Ket [755]

Answer:

jury

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why would a city want to annex a suburban neighborhood?
    12·2 answers
  • A following distance greater than 3 seconds is advised when you
    7·1 answer
  • Why are the trees green
    15·2 answers
  • Are executive orders ever unconstitutional?
    14·1 answer
  • Who decides the times places and manner of elections for congress
    14·1 answer
  • Who owns the rights to sell Cadbury in the US? Why is this a conflict now?
    10·2 answers
  • The types of cases a court can hear is referred to as its
    14·2 answers
  • HELP!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • What is an example of an event that might require a public affairs professional?
    13·1 answer
  • Describe TWO ways in which the above law protects citizens against human right violations​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!