1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga nikolaevna [1]
3 years ago
9

Benefits of high wages during the industrial revolution? Will give brainlist :)

History
1 answer:
djverab [1.8K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Historians are divided over what happened to wages during the Industrial Revolution. Everyone agrees that they did increase; the question is, when. ... Most people agree that after about 1840, real wages did better. Nicholas Crafts and Terence Mills shows that from 1840 to 1910, real wages more than doubled.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
1. Is an executive order the same as making a law?
zlopas [31]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Presidents define situations or conditions on situations that become legal or economic truth. These orders carry the same force of law as executive order the difference between the two is that executive orders are aimed at those inside government while proclamations are aimed at those outside government.

3 0
2 years ago
Can plss tell me the answer​
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

If this is a true or false question then true. Please make me brainlyist

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What are the six ideas of the enlightenment?
svlad2 [7]
The Age of Enlightenment promoted a confidence in reason or intellectual enquiry to bring greater happiness and progress to humanity; a belief that all aspects of the human and natural worlds are susceptible of rational explanation; and the desire to battle against ignorance, dogma, superstition, injustice and oppression.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does judicial activism compare to judicial restraint?
I am Lyosha [343]
Generally speaking, judicial activism is the opposite of judicial restraint in that when a judge is especially "active," he or she imposes more of his or her own will in the case, whereas if a judge is more "restrained," they rely more on precedent. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, courts can require states to
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

Not to Appoint government officials if voting districts are unfair.

Explanation:

As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, courts can require states to not appoint government officials if voting districts are unfair.

In the past redistricting issues weren’t settled by federal courts as a result of the people feeling it had political undertone and would be biased but it has changed as a result of the Baker v. Carr Supreme Court judgement.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did space exploration affect the cold war during the 70's
    5·1 answer
  • For years, China had enjoyed a favorable balance of trade with foreign nations. But the British trade of with China disrupted th
    6·1 answer
  • What are the 4 elements of free enterprise?
    5·1 answer
  • The tribes of central and Southern Africa are based on which customs?
    12·1 answer
  • What prompted the war between the vietminh and the french?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statements correctly describe characteristics of the Maya's civilization? Choose all answers that are correct. A. accepted
    5·1 answer
  • Why was jefferson davis important?
    6·1 answer
  • Santiago receives an allowance of $7 every week.How much total does he receive after 4 weeks?
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELPP!!! 17 POINTS!
    8·2 answers
  • Who was the first usa president
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!