Answer:
breach of the implied of merchantability
Explanation:
Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.
Indeed, Vivian suffered a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
<h3>What is money?</h3>
Money is a trade good accepted by general consent as a medium of economic conversation. It is the medium in which prices and values are expressed. It flows from person to person and country to country, making trade, and it is the debt measure of wealth. Money is any good that is widely used and accepted in written accounts involving the transfer of goods and divine service from one person to another.
Maybe doing something very likely to accomplish anything When we are weary, we are all more likely to make mistakes. The bridge could fall down at any time. liable to something is that you are likely to be impacted by it. If you exercise infrequently, you are more likely to get hurt.
Therefore, a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
Learn more about money here:
brainly.com/question/22984856
#SPJ2
Answer:
Option B (Positive aspect)
Explanation:
Under United States supreme ruling on commerce clause,there are two aspects of the commerce clause: the positive aspect and the negative, or dormant aspect.
The provision in Article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution, the national government has the exclusive authority to regulate commerce that substantially affects trade and commerce among the states. This express grant of authority to the national government, which is shown in Gibbson vs. Ogden in which the Court decided that the federal government has exclusive power over interstate commerce.
Therefore,the commerce clause's express grant of exclusive authority to regulate commerce that substantially affects trade and commerce among states is referred to as the positive aspect. While, Negative aspect is that the states do not have the authority to regulate interstate( Involving, existing between, or connecting two or more states.)commerce. This negative aspect of the commerce clause is often referred to as the "dormant" (implied) commerce clause.
Answer:
Option 2 is the right answer
Explanation:
When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.
The Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) is a federal law that protects consumers when they transfer funds electronically, including through the use of debit cards, automated teller machines (ATMs), and automatic withdrawals from a bank account.