Answer: bribery and conflict of interest
Explanation: In simple words, bribery refers to the act under which one individual tries to persuade the behavior of another individual for his benefit by offering him or her monetary benefits.
Whereas, conflict of interest refers to a situation when someone has the authority to make decisions that benefits himself more than the entity he is working for.
Hence we can conclude that the above case depicts bribery and conflict of interest.
The answer is C. the people who provide the service or the experience customers will have
Answer:
0.4
Explanation:
Given that,
Convenience store advertises 50% off frozen slushies: This means that the price of slushies decreases by 50%.
20% Fewer sales of fountain drinks: This means that the quantity demanded of fountain drink decreases by 20%.
Percentage change in the price of slushies = 50%
Percentage change in the quantity demanded of fountain drink = 20%
Cross price elasticity measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded for one good to any change in the price level of the other good.
Therefore, the cross elasticity between slushies and fountain drinks is as follows:
= Percentage change in the quantity demanded of fountain drink ÷ Percentage change in the price of slushies
= 20 ÷ 50
= 0.4
Therefore, the positive cross price elasticity indicates that these are the substitute goods.
This economy could move closer towards its production possibilities curve by e<span>mploying more of its available resources.
The production possibility curves is a theoretical portrayal of the measure of two unique merchandise that can be gotten by moving assets from the creation of one to the generation of the other. The bend is utilized to portray a general public's decision between two unique merchandise.
</span>
Answer:
Adam is buying on margin.
Explanation:
When you buy a stock on margin it means that your broker borrowed you some of the money needed for the purchase of the stock.
In this case, Adam is buying stock on margin because he only had $7,000 and his broker lent him the extra $3,000 he needed to purchase the shares he wanted.
