Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
There are various potential difficulties one might encounter when doing business in the Chinese market. Some of which are:
1. Intellectual property issue: this is an area of business that is known to be one of the big issues in China. It is reported that a lot of inventors have problems in protecting their inventions, as many other competitors can just pick the invention idea and build on it without sanctions.
2. Governmental challenges: there is a huge issue of lack of transparency and corruption in China, most especially against foreign business owners.
3. Market Access: because of the diverse and big difference in consumers' consumption habits and distribution operations in China compared to other countries, most especially non-Indochina countries, will make the market access difficult for foreign business.
4. Consumer preference: consumers' preference in China is reported to be different and distinct compared to what is obtained outside China. Hence, foreign business owners will find it challenging to cope.
5. Bureaucracy: to obtain necessary licenses and permits in china requires going through a long process, which may even be more delayed to foreign business owners.
Nathan is considered to be a franchiser. A franchiser is
being defined as someone who owns an overaching company or trademarks and
products in which they give a right to the franchisee to be able to run the
franchise’s location in which is agreed with a fee.
A taxable income is the total amount of money left after being deducted by other government payments. Meanwhile, a disposable income is the accounting of income taxes in an employee's payroll. Therefore, Ashton's taxable income is, $80,000 while his disposable income is $75,500.
Answer:
Tami and Construction Inc. Vs. Frank
Can Frank sue Tami or Construction, Inc. and recover damages if either party breaches the contract?
Frank will not be successful if he sues either party because he is an incidental beneficiary.
Explanation:
Frank is just an incidental beneficiary and a third party who benefits from the contract between Tami and Construction, Inc. The contract is not intended to benefit Frank. Therefore, Frank does not have any legal rights under the contract. He cannot successfully sue Tami or Construction, Inc. if either party breaches the contract. He lacks the contractual rights to sue either party.