Answer:
Reactance.
Explanation:
This is simply explained the juror's motives and doings which directly tells that inadmissible evidence violates due process, and legal evidentiary standards dictate that a curative instruction is appropriate to minimize the risk that the jury is misled by the unacceptable information.
Psychologists posit that jurors are likely to follow the prescribed corrective action only if motivated and able to do so. Research shows that jurors do attempt to use information in a fair manner and to align their decisions with the judge’s instructions. However, juror motivation also may be affected by reactance resistance to a judge’s admonition when it is seen as constraining effective deliberation unless the judge can offer a clear and compelling reason as to why the information is unreliable or irrelevant to the case. Jurors may resist giving up information that they find probative.
B. inflation
I think because the others answers don't seem legitamate
Answer:
Explanation:
The consequences of a speedy removal will be important to the United States, to individual States, and to the Indians themselves.
Answer:
(of a bad, difficult, or unwelcome situation or phenomenon) present or experienced to a severe or intense degree.
Explanation:
Answer:
c. superego
Explanation:
Sigmund Feud studies that human personality has three components which determine its complexity and they are called Id, ego, and superego. Where Id is the unconscious element and ego is driven by reason, superego incorporates the norms and values which children learn from their parents and other social elements.
