Answer:
B. translation, then reflection.
Step-by-step explanation:
translation means moving the shape without flipping or rotating it.
reflection means flipping it like in a mirror
Cant really show you how to do it but the graph would start at the y axis at (0,-2) then from there each point would move to the left 4 and up 7 or back 4 and down 7. It would form a straight line.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
it’s the third one
Answer: Both families were travelling at the same speed/rate of 1mile/0.65mins or 1mile/0.01hr.
Step-by-step explanation: Speed of Houck family's train = 552m/6hrs
speed of Robert family's train = 744m/8hrs.
Therefore considering Houck speed,
552miles = 6hours
1mile = (6 x 60)/552
= 360/552
= 0.65minutes. Average speed = 1mile/0.65mins. Or 1mile/0.01hr
For Robert
744miles = 8hours
1mile = ( 8 x 60 )/744
= (480/744)minutes
= 0.645
= 0.65minutes. Average speed = 1mile/0.65mins. Or 1mile/0.01hr
Conclusion: Both families were travelling at the same speed/rate.
To get that minutes in hour, just divide by 60 to get concert to hours.
5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
