1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kogti [31]
3 years ago
13

Provide one piece of evidence from the period between the first and the second world wars that supports keegan's interpretation

(source 1) and explain how it supports the interpretation.
History
1 answer:
Cloud [144]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

According to John Keegan, the world wars was not necessary and it was very tragic.

Explanation:

John Keegan was an eminent military historians who wrote great books about wars, one of which is "The First World War". This book was published in the year 1998.

He speaks that the first world war was tragic and it was not necessary. Keegan interprets that the series of events which led to the war could be broken at any time from the five weeks of the crisis which preceded the clash of the arms for the first time. It killed the lives of many millions of people and destroyed the benevolent of the European culture and heritage. He believed that the second world war was a direct outcome of the first world war.

You might be interested in
What did rich victorian children do?
viktelen [127]
Many rich victorian children were the children of the political and social elite, and therefore they attended the best schools and took classes on things like etiquette
3 0
4 years ago
In The Dark Game, what is the central idea of the section about Elizabeth Van Lew? a) Elizabeth Van Lew used her servants to tra
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

<em><u>d</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Eliza</u></em><em><u>beth</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Van</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Lew</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>was</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>valuable</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>legendary</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>spy</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>in</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Civil</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>War</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>

Explanation:

In "The Dark Game," the central idea of the section about Elizabeth Van Lew was that <em>Elizabeth</em><em> </em><em>Van</em><em> </em><em>Lew</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>valuable</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>legendary</em><em> </em><em>spy</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>Civil</em><em> </em><em>War</em><em>.</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think that the emperor has less power than a shogun?
Sergio039 [100]
At the time the shogun was the leader of the samurai and the emperor basically did nothing but sit in his fancy chair while the shogun was almost the leader of Japan because basically im monky
3 0
3 years ago
Which best describes how slaves were regarded in the South in the pre-Civil War years?
lozanna [386]
"As valuable property" is the one among the following choices given in the question that <span>best describes how slaves were regarded in the South in the pre-Civil War years. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope the answer helps you.</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is 1845 significant in Texas history?
olga55 [171]

Answer:

The Republic of Texas (Spanish: República de Tejas) was a sovereign state in North America that existed from March 2, 1836, to February 19, 1846, although Mexico considered it a rebellious province during its entire existence. It was bordered by Mexico to the west and southwest, the Gulf of Mexico to the southeast, the two U.S. states of Louisiana and Arkansas to the east and northeast, and United States territories encompassing parts of the current U.S. states of Oklahoma, Kansas, Colorado, Wyoming, and New Mexico to the north and west. The citizens of the republic were known as Texians.

The region of the Mexican state of Coahuila y Tejas, now commonly referred to as Mexican Texas, declared its independence from Mexico during the Texas Revolution in 1835–1836, when the Centralist Republic of Mexico abolished autonomy from states of the Mexican federal republic. The major fighting in the Texas war of independence ended on April 21, 1836, but the Mexican Congress refused to recognize the independence of the Republic of Texas, since the agreement was signed by Mexican President General Antonio López de Santa Anna under duress as prisoner of the Texians. There were intermittent conflicts between Mexico and Texas into the 1840s. The United States recognized the Republic of Texas in March 1837 but declined to annex the territory.[3]

Explanation:

THANK ME

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements best fits the Mughal dynasty? A. Territory in North Africa B. Large Christian population C. La
    14·2 answers
  • William ramsay, who was a skeptic about the historical accuracy of the bible, changed his mind after researching one of the gosp
    8·2 answers
  • Which Colony did not meet at the First Continental Congress?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the task of the United States Department of Homeland Security?
    7·2 answers
  • Why can the civil war be described as the first<br> "modern war "?
    13·1 answer
  • What conflicts did the american settlers, native Americans, and Mexicans Americans in the Mexican cession experience
    15·2 answers
  • Sorry for bad image quality XD but pls answer
    11·1 answer
  • On the basis of this excerpt, what is of central importance for a monk?
    10·1 answer
  • List the three ways in which British governors came to power in colonies of North America.
    13·1 answer
  • The Nazi secret police unit was known as what?<br> O Gestapo<br> O KGB<br> O Red Army<br> O Tojo
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!