Answer:
about 1,822.41 today
Explanation:
an increase of 862.41 over 28 years
Answer:
C) Independence
Explanation:
A) Limited potential is not at all related to the excerpt
B) In no form does the passage mention any interaction with customers
The same goes with the answer D)
E) The passage states multiple lines with allusions to how they change what they want, not receive change itself from an outside force. "Operating their own" "Masters if their own destinies" "Take a vacation"
Answer:
Job sharing
Explanation:
Job sharing is a sort of adaptable work course of action in which two individuals work to finish the work one individual would do in a self-contained all day job. In job-sharing agreement, two people handle work, and they share salaries. Hours can change: They may cooperate some portion of the week, and they may never observe one another.
Answer:
A) No, in the presence of a negative externality, since the monopolist produces less than the competitive quantity, it may end up producing the socially efficient quantity. However, in the case of a positive externality, since a competitive market produces too little, a monopolist will only exacerbate the problem.
Explanation:
Monopolists produce less than the competitive quantity (marginal revenue = marginal cost) but charge a higher price for their products. In case a negative externality is produced, then the competitive quantity should decrease and the monopolist might end up producing the socially efficient quantity.
Given the same scenario where the monopolist produces less than competitive quantity, but a positive externality is produced, then the socially efficient quantity should increase, but the monopolist will not increase their output.
Answer:
18 %
Explanation:
Annual rate of return on this investment = annual profit / average investment x 100
where,
annual profit = $108000
average investment = (initial cost + salvage value) ÷ 2
= ($900000 + $300000) ÷ 2
= $600,000
therefore,
annual rate of return on this investment = $108000 / $600,000 x 100
= 18 %
