The statements accurately describe key compromises reached at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 :
The Three-Fifths Compromise established that the population of enslaved people in a state would be only partially represented in that state’s official population.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, established that Congress would be composed of one house in which representation was based on a state’s size and one in which every state was represented equally.
Option : B and C.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Constitutional Convention is a major event that took place in 1787. It decided that how America will be governed in future days. Moreover, it ratified by all the 13 states and resulted in three major compromises. They are Three-Fifths compromise, Great compromise, and Electoral College.
Firstly, the Great compromise ended the issue between the states regarding the representation of members in both houses.
Secondly, the Three-Fifths made the enslaved person's representation to be calculated as three-fifths of the white person in the House of representatives.
Finally, the electoral college resolved how the president can be elected.
It comes from the Latin word "forensis" pertaining to a forum. ... The meaning of "forensic" later came to be restricted to refer to the courts of law. The word entered English usage in 1659.
Answer:
To change direction by making a two-point turn, you'll need to use either a driveway or a cross street. Check for traffic and slow down as you get ready to turn. Next, pull slowly into the driveway or street, turning the steering wheel as needed.
Answer:
Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.
Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.
