Answer:
The answer is: A) Mary Jane has a comparative advantage in law so she should specialize in law and hire a carpenter to make her cabinets.
Explanation:
Mary Jane has a comparative advantage by working as a lawyer over working as a carpenter. As a lawyer she can earn $150 an hour.
Considering that Mary Jane is 3 times as fast as a good carpenter, her work as a carpenter could be valued as the combined work of three carpenters. But even three carpenters earn less than a lawyer; $60 an hour ($20 an hour per carpenter times 3 carpenters).
So Mary Jane definitely should work as a lawyer and hire a carpenter or even three carpenters to build her cabinets.
Answer:
Providing a subsidy to correct for an underallocation of resources.
Explanation:
In Economics, subsidy can be defined as the amount of money or benefits such as tax reduction given by the government to sellers in order to sustain production and enable the buy to continuously purchase the product.
If the production of a product or service involves external benefits, then the government can improve efficiency in the market by providing a subsidy to correct for an underallocation of resources such as capital, land and labor used for production of these products.
The way brain cells connect and develop will be influenced by a newborns experience with adults and the environent
Answer:
When Monopolies Are Good. Sometimes a monopoly is necessary. It ensures consistent delivery of a product or service that has a very high up-front cost. An example is electric and water utilities. Brainliest Please
Explanation:
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
