1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Xelga [282]
3 years ago
13

What were the major empires in between the 11th-16th centuries?

History
2 answers:
Whitepunk [10]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

The development of such major Sudanic kingdoms and empires as Ghana, Mali, Songhai, the Hausa states, and Kanem-Bornu along the southern fringes of the Sahara had a number of important consequences for the history of western Africa as a whole

nlexa [21]3 years ago
5 0
The precise term Sacrum Romanum Imperium dates only from 1254, though the term Holy Empire reaches back to 1157, and the term Roman Empire was used from 1034 to denote the lands under Conrad II’s rule. The term “Roman emperor” is older, dating from Otto II (died 983). This title, however, was not used by Otto II’s predecessors, from Charlemagne (or Charles I) to Otto I, who simply employed the phrase imperator augustus (“august emperor”) without any territorial adjunct. The first title that Charlemagne is known to have used, immediately after his coronation in 800, is “Charles, most serene Augustus, crowned by God, great and pacific emperor, governing the Roman empire.” This clumsy formula, however, was soon discarded.

Holy Roman Empire
Holy Roman Empire
Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire, 10th century; in the treasury of Hofburg palace, Vienna.
Erich Lessing/Magnum
These questions about terms reveal some of the problems involved in the nature and early history of the empire. It can be regarded as a political institution, or approached from the point of view of political theory, or treated in the context of the history of Christendom as the secular counterpart of a world religion. The history of the empire is also not to be confused or identified with the history of its constituent kingdoms, Germany and Italy, though clearly they are interrelated. The constituent territories retained their identity; the emperors, in addition to the imperial crown, also wore the crowns of their kingdoms. Finally, whereas none of the earlier emperors from Otto I had assumed the imperial title until actually crowned by the pope in Rome, after Charles V none was emperor in this sense, though all laid claim to the imperial dignity as if they had been duly crowned as well as elected. Despite these anomalies and others, the empire, at least in the Middle Ages, was by common assent, along with the papacy, the most important institution of western Europe.


Theologians, lawyers, popes, ecclesiastics, rulers, rebels like Arnold of Brescia and Cola di Rienzo, literary figures like Dante and Petrarch, and the practical men, members of the high nobility, on whom the emperors relied for support, all saw the empire in a different light and had their own ideas of its origin, function, and justification. Among these heterogeneous and often incompatible views, three may be said to predominate: (1) the papal theory, according to which the empire was the secular arm of the church, set up by the papacy for its own purposes and therefore answerable to the pope and, in the last resort, to be disposed of by him; (2) the imperial, or Frankish, theory, which placed greater emphasis on conquest and hegemony as the source of the emperor’s power and authority and according to which he was responsible directly to God; and (3) the popular, or Roman, theory (the “people” at this stage being synonymous with the nobility and in this instance with the Roman nobility), according to which the empire, following the tradition of Roman law, was a delegation of powers by the Roman people. Of the three theories the last was the least important; it was evidently directed against the pope, whose constitutive role it implicitly denied, but it was also a specifically Italian reaction against the predominance in practice of Frankish and German elements.

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.
Subscribe Now
It is also important to distinguish between the universalist and localist conceptions of the empire, which have been the source of considerable controversy among historians. According to the former, the empire was a universal monarchy, a “commonwealth of the whole world, whose sublime unity transcended every minor distinction”; and the emperor “was entitled to the obedience of Christendom.” According to the latter, the emperor had no ambition for universal dominion; his policy was limited in the same way as that of every other ruler, and when he made more far-reaching claims his object was normally to ward off the attacks either of the pope or of the Byzantine emperor. According to this view, also, the origin of the empire is to be explained by specific local circumstances rather than by far-flung theories.

Load Next Page
Hope this helps !
You might be interested in
Question 5 of 10 The purpose of the Constitutional Convention was to fix problems in the Articles of Confederation. What did the
notka56 [123]

Answer:

They ended up writing the US constitution(D).

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What was Columbus searching for when he sailed from Spain?
Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

The explorer Christopher Columbus made four trips across the Atlantic Ocean from Spain: in 1492, 1493, 1498 and 1502. He was determined to find a direct water route west from Europe to Asia, but he never did. Instead, he stumbled upon the Americas.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does Holmes rule differently in the two free speech cases, Shenck and Abrams
iren2701 [21]
Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the decision for the Supreme Court. It supported <span>Schenck's conviction, saying it did not violate his First Amendment right of speech. </span><span>
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
List 3 departments that were part of Washington’s executive branch
umka2103 [35]
1. The Department of War (Henry Knox)
2. The Department of the Treasury (Alexander Hamilton)
3. The Department of the State (Thomas Jefferson)

All of them were established in 1789.
5 0
4 years ago
Plz plz plz hury plz hury asap 1: Qin Shi HuangShihuangdi (Qin Shi Huang) Shang Yang introduced a range of administrative techni
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

Zheng created a concept called Legalism. This created a sentiment that was outside of the realm of the former Dhaoism, in which humans felt their attachment to the world around them. This was more of a practical approach to the functioning of society. Its effects were very harsh and clear laws, and the desire to grow their statehood.

Liu Bang (256 - 195 BC), Emperor Gaozu of the Western Han Dynasty, is the first emperor of the Han Dynasty (202 BC - 220 AD). As an outstanding politician, strategist and director, he made great contributions to the development of Han people and its culture. In 206 BC, he rebelled against the despotic rule of the Qin Dynasty (221 - 207 BC) and together with Xiang Yu, led the uprising army against the Qin. In October of 206 BC, he and his army attacked Xianyang, the capital city of the Qin and overthrew the Qin Dynasty.

In his youth, he was considered as a futile boy because he usually played truant and seemed to have no ambition. Later Liu was very lucky to be a low-ranked official in Sishui and, to some degree, was well-known among the neighborhoods. One day, as he saw Emperor Qin Shi Huang sitting in a delicate and gorgeous carriage he admired so much, thought that it should be a real man to be bestowed such luxuriant treatment. Since then, Liu started to show his distinct personal strength.

Brainliest?

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name three ways that these voyages made a significant impact on geography?
    7·1 answer
  • How old was isaac newton when he became a professor of lucasian of mathematics?
    9·1 answer
  • In what book did Muslims collect the words that Muhammad said Allah spoke to him?
    11·2 answers
  • Which behavior was not allowed under the jewish 10 commadments
    14·1 answer
  • J.P. Morgan, Andrew Carnegie, and John D. Rockefeller were major titans of industry during the Gilded Age (in banking, steel, an
    5·1 answer
  • NEED HELP 2 QUESTIONS
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT associated with Sherman's March to the Sea?
    11·1 answer
  • What was NOT true about the economy at the end of World War II?
    6·1 answer
  • What are laws to control slaves​
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the father of the turks"" that led the turkish nationalists in the 1920s to modernize turkey and create a new democratic
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!