Answer:
C) Displacement
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this scenario best illustrates the use of a defense mechanism known as Displacement. In the context of psychology, this mechanism is when negative feelings are transferred from the main source towards something that the individual is less scared of, either another person or object. Which is what is happening in this scenario as each individual takes their anger out on the person their less threatened by.
Answer:
1. Companies using FIFO will report the highest gross profit and net income.
2. Companies using FIFO will report the smallest cost of goods sold.
3. Weighted average cost of goods sold will be between FIFO and LIFO costs of goods sold.
4. Companies using FIFO will pay higher taxes than companies using LIFO, assuming all else being equal.
Explanation:
If costs are rising, companies using FIFO will report higher profits simply because they calculate cost of goods sold based on the oldest products which were purchased at a lower cost.
FIFO and LIFO costs will be the extreme points, FIFO showing lowest costs while LIFO will result in the highest costs, while the weighted average will be in between.
Since companies using FIFO report higher profits, they will have to pay more taxes.
How does associative thinking help businesses consider ways to expand? <span>It is a required part of the creative process. Associative thinking is defined as the way our brains process information through relationships, patterns, modeling and unrelated elements. Thinking like this is part of the process when creating a new item or developing new advertisements for an organization. People use associative thinking everyday, they allow us to see beyond our current situations. </span>
Answer:
lower national consumption, higher national saving;
D, investment will be crowded out.
Explanation:
If the Federal government is to purchase goods and services and taxes are to be used to finance the purchase, this can economically mean that the government will have to save more of the taxes collected and reduce how much it spends. This will mean that the government is not going to borrow funds to finance the purchase which is another option.
On the other hand, if the government was running at full employment and then increases its borrowing, it means that one or more sectors of the market economy will be affected due to the government's increased interference in another sector as it tries to raise funds for the purchase of goods and services. This also means that private investments will thin out to the barest minimum.
Cheers
Explanation:
plz write in English I don't understand