The definition states that human rights have to be protected by the law. In my opinion every human being should have human rights.
It's been a while since I've done social studies, but I believe the answer is B, he was crowned by the pope.
The answer is "Backward chaining".
Backward chaining is a deduction technique generally utilized as a part of man-made reasoning, computerized hypothesis provers and evidence associates. Backward chaining approach can be portrayed as working again from an objective. It's a standout amongst the most ordinarily utilized strategies for prevailing upon impedance rules and intelligent implication. Backward chaining works in reverse from a rundown of objectives to decide if there is any information to help them.
Answer:
- Violation of personal rights
Explanation:
As per the details provided, the given situation would exemplify a 'breach of personal rights.' It would be considered 'Larceny' meaning 'unlawful taking of the personal property as an attempt to deprive the legal owner of it permanently,' Says the FBI. Therefore, <u>the couple can be charged under the violation of the man's individual/personal rights as they took his money without even asking for his consent</u>. Such a crime has a punishment of imprisonment of the guilty for five years along with the fine depending on the amount or amount of property is taken over and how.
Answer : d. disposition fee
In leasing a car, disposition fee does not contribute to the initial cost of leasing a car. A disposition fee is paid upon returning the car. This is done so in order to pay for the leasing company's expenses in disposing or selling away the leased car.
