A child’s aggressive behavior that attempts to harm the self-esteem of another is called verbal aggression.
Verbal aggression is a kind of nonphysical aggression which involves the use of a range of words to exhibit aggressive behavior. Examples of verbal aggression include screaming, swearing, insulting, name-calling, accusing and other unkind and cruel remarks intended to cause distress and pain.
When a child is involved in verbal aggression, they may seek to damage another child’s self-esteem and reputation. The child engages in verbal aggression may harm the self-esteem of another child in many ways, such as by name calling in order to make fun of them, uttering devaluing remarks with the intent to harm their image, and insulting and shouting in presence of other children with a purpose of causing pain to them.
You can learn more about self-esteem at
brainly.com/question/8992294
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not include questions, we can say the following.
Erikson's concept of generativity is similar to the Biblical concept of generosity or do good to others.
When we are talking about psychological terms, scientist Erik Erikson developed eight stages of his theory called psychosocial development. The term "Generativity" was introduced in the seventh stage of the theory when the author refers to Generativity vs. Stagnation. Erikson says that during this stage of the life of humans, people focus on making positive contributions that benefit other human beings.
Explanation:
Lex talionis means treating the criminals in the way the criminals treated the victims. In means giving the same sufferings to others as others have caused them suffering.
This principle is not plausible because according to Nathanson, it will make us to act in an immoral way with others. We cannot hijack the hijacker's plane because they did to us. We cannot spy on others because others are spying on us. Nathanson objected the principle because he believes that it is not possible to measure sufferings of others as different people suffered differently. So we cannot bring equal suffering.
Le podría donar libros que no ocupas o ropa que no ocupas
The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution<span> as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalists claimed the </span>Constitution<span> gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.</span>
