The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Based on the Judicial Branch the court case that stands out to me the most is Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas.
For me, this is one of the most important cases in the history of the United States.
The case was decided on May 17, 1954. The Supreme Court decided that state laws in the US public school system that kept racial segregation were unconstitutional.
This was a major advancement in the country regarding the shameful subject of racism. After the US Supreme Court decision, racial segregation in public schools of America ended, at least in theory and by judicial mandate.
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
Answer:skill building training or program
Explanation:
Skill building programs are meant to equip someone with necessary skills which are required to effectively perform a particular task.
People need the be trained in order for them to improve or have skills that are needed in their given task. When someone get a position or move from one level to another they may be a change in tasks that they will be doing in their new position hence they need new skills which are specified for that position that they would be taking and training is crucial in equipping them with such skills.
I believe steel was used to make guns back in the days.
For example, the civil war.
They used steel for guns.
And the <span>Revolutionary</span> War,
Colonists used to smuggle weapons out of factory's because they had no money.
The only phobia that Americans score higher than their fear of public speaking, according to a 2001 survey by Geoffrey Brewer that was published on the Gallup Polls website, is their fear of snakes.
<h3>What is the scariest fear about speaking in front of groups?</h3>
Up to 75% of the general population may suffer from glossophobia, or a fear of public speaking, which is a rather common phobia. Some people may have some degree of apprehension at the idea of delivering a speech in front of an audience, while others may experience utter dread and horror. 75% of respondents, according to the National Institutes of Mental Health, claim that public speaking is their biggest fear.
<h3>Why do so many people fear snakes so much American Scientific?</h3>
The perception of the American public is their fear of snakes. Recent research have found that people are naturally predisposed to see snakes and spiders as dangerous and to acquire a fear of them. Researchers found that among a variety of non-threatening objects, adults and children could recognize photographs of snakes more quickly than they could recognize frogs, flowers, or caterpillars.
Learn more about glossophobia: brainly.com/question/15945199
#SPJ4
