Answer:
1
Explanation:
According to my research on the different levels of disaster, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this situation would be classified as a level 1 disaster. This is the case because level 1 disasters are events that pose an immediate threat to an individual's health, life, or surroundings and usually affect a small number of people. Which seems to be the case in this situation since only one person was stranded and at risk because of the flooding.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
<em>Therefore the gain or loss to the current shareholders of Goodday if the merger provides no synergy is -$10
</em>
Explanation:
Given:
<em>The Total debt remains same after merger at Pre-merger value = $80 + $40 = $120
</em>
<em>The Value of entities together in Economic state 1 = $160 + $20 = $180
</em>
<em>
Net equity in economic state 1 = Value of entities – total debt
</em>
<em>
= $180 - $120 = $60
</em>
<em>Then,</em>
<em>
The Value of entities in Economic state 2 = $40 + $80 = $120
</em>
<em>
Net equity in economic state 2 =
</em>
<em>= $120 - $120 = $0
</em>
<em>
The Both states are equally possible.
</em>
<em>
Expected value of combined entity = ($60 + $0)/2 = $30
</em>
<em>
Market value of Goodday equity before merger = $40
</em>
<em>
Synergy effect = Expected value of combined entity - Market value of Goodday equity before merger= $30 - $40 = -$10
</em>
Answer:
-$4,000 unfavourable
Explanation:
The sales volume variance is calculated as ;
= (Actual sales units - Estimated sales units) × Estimated selling price.
Given that;
Actual sales units = 8,000
Estimated sales units = 10,000 units
Estimates selling price = $2 per unit
Therefore,
Sales volume variance = (8,000 - 10,000) × $2
Sales volume variance = -$4,000 unfavourable
Answer:
This question refers to a situation where two team leaders (or co-leaders) were engaged in a romantic relationship. When relationships end, things start to change form being great to the opposite. This eventually led to a decrease in the team's productivity and could eventually result in a harassment lawsuit because Randall refused to let Abbe go and kept insisting on the failed relationship.
Since management didn't care about what was happening (even though Abbe told them), and they only cared about the decrease in productivity; we can conclude that they were engaging in a stability strategy. They were trying to maintain the status quo and turn everything back as it used to be before the relationship started, but things were not that easy.