Answer:
C) I and II
There is a gap in the Potato Chips group for the stem "14" and the Tortilla Chips group for the stem "12"
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
<span>C) salt water is the correct answer.</span>
If the equation is in the form of y = mx + C, where m and C are real numbers, the slope (which means gradient) of the line is the coefficient of x (I.e. the number to the left of x in simple language), which is m.
In this case, m = 54 and C = -13pie. Both are real numbers, which means that this equation satisfies the form of y = mx + C
m is the coefficient of x, which is 54. 54 is the gradient of this line, which means that for every 54 y-axis units the line increases, the line increases 1 x-axis unit.
Hope this helps! :)