Answer:
The answer is 1. Culture shock
Explanation:
What is culture shock?
According to Merriam-Webster, culture shock is defined as the sense of confusion and uncertainty sometimes with feelings of anxiety that may affect people exposed to an alien culture or environment without adequate preparation.
With the definition above, it is therefore safe to say that, in the case of Hayley feeling uncomfortable and disoriented in a new environment, she is experiencing Culture Shock.
Answer:
Either you quit trying and lose $800 sunk, or you spend $800 for $1,600 total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600. That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
Explanation:
Since $800 has been spent which means Spending up to an additional $1,000 is still reasonable, but a condition in which you know that the deal will definitely go through.
Secondly since you have already sunk $800, and you know that spending an additional $800 would guarantee it, you can do one among this two options which are either you stop trying and lose the $800 sunk, or you the spend $800 for $1,600($1,000+$600) total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600($1,000-$800=200,$800-$200=$600). That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
Yes experiencing communication will result with better communication because the experienced person may know many words and new words to complete his communication
Answer:
.b.can agree to a new contract that includes the new price
Explanation:
When Sal and Tasty agreed to cancel their first contract, that was the end of that particular contract. No further negotiations can take place because the contract doe not exist. By calling Tasty the following day, Sal was initiating a new contract.
A new contract does not need to make any references to the canceled contract. Sal and Tasty are free to negotiate for new terms and negotiations since this is a new contract. The details of the canceled contract are no longer binding to them.
Answer:
total long term debt: 24,000,000
Explanation:
the 1988 bonds will be long-term debt as there is no suggestion to the option to be exercised.
The 1978 bonds will be current liabilities as they matures at 2012
which is within the twelve months time period to be classified as current laibily.
the note payable has an agreement with the bank to not claim it at least until June 2012 The most probable reason is that the 1978 bonds are generating this situation, so once they are retired the normal 2 to 1 ratio will be acomplished, so the note payable will be kept at long term debt
but a note tothe financial statemtn should be made
Long term debt:
1988 bonds: 10,000,000
note payable 14,000,000
total 24,000,000
