Answer: $18,460
Explanation:
Amounts that will go towards the cash account at the end of the year include all actual cash, undeposited checks, bank balances and short term investments.
The Total amount of cash to report will therefore be;
= Currency located at the company + Short-term investments that mature within three months + Balance in savings account + Checks received from customers but not yet deposited + Coins located at the company + Balance in checking account
= 1,050+ 1,950 + 8,500 + 650 + 110 + 6,200
= $18,460
A central planning board makes all economic decisions concerning resources and. The government owns most property, resources are the characteristics that best describe a command system.
<h3>What is command system?</h3>
Command system is the economic system where government has a special and major role. That detects the economic with the real world problem like the coordination problem, moral problem, hazardous problem and others.
Thus, option B and C are correct.
For more details about command system, click here:
brainly.com/question/14655086
#SPJ1
Answer:
This proposal will not work.
Explanation:
All taxes work the same way, it doesn't matter if they are payroll taxes or taxes on goods or services. In this case, labor is the service provided by the employees (suppliers) and the employer is the consumer. A tax increase will reduce the demand for labor, and therefore the equilibrium price of labor (wage) will also decrease. If wages decreases, then workers are not going to be better off, on the contrary they will be worse off. This tax increase will lower both the wage and the employment level.
I had to look for the options and here is my answer:
Based on the given description above, I can say that the Baumrind's parenting style that Matt and Tamela use is AUTHORITATIVE PARENTING. This is the type of parenting wherein parents impose limits on their children, but with a reason. Still, they respond to whatever their children needs.
Answer:
Why can't the Fed push the rate any lower than zero?
Real interest rates can be lower than zero, or negative (because inflation rate is higher than interest rate), but nominal interest rates are generally only limited to zero. But during this same time, the European Central Bank actually started paying negative interest rates on money deposits and many European private banks followed. That means that they charged people for having their money on the bank.
Why do you think that the Fed was so seemingly reluctant to push the rate all the way to the floor?
The reason why the Fed was not willing to push the interest rates to zero or even below zero was that by doing so, the US dollar would have depreciated or lost value. In Europe this was done to encourage people to spend their money and not save as much, but in the US that is not really a problem. Generally in the US the problem is that people spend too much and save too little, but on some European countries and Japan, people tend to save too much. For example in Japan the national savings rate fluctuates between 22-40%, while the maximum savings rate in the US has been 10.4% in 1960, it currently is around 7.6%.
