<em>Awnser</em><em>:</em><em> </em><em>Kings</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>Priests</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>Nobles</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
I think it is A. because it modifies the truck.
Answer:
The appetite differs because toddlers could eat more or less than infants, usually less because they are picky sometimes. If you can, plz mark brainliest, it would help a lot. Have a nice day ;)
Explanation:
The answer is deception. police are allowed to deceive an individual during an interrogation.
