Answer: Scholars
Explanation:
Today the relevance of scholars is not as important as it used to be prior to the 1500s when they were the custodians of knowledge.
In those days scholars as the intellectuals of the day were given the role and responsibility of maintaining the knowledge of society and as such they were referred to when issues of right and wrong arose. They would then offer opinions on these issues based on the wealth of knowledge at their disposal including ancient texts and religious sources like the Bible and the Quran.
Answer:
Reconstruction involved more than the meaning of emancipation. Women also sought to redefine their roles within the nation and in their local communities. The abolitionist and women’s rights movements simultaneously converged and began to clash. In the South, both black and white women struggled to make sense of a world of death and change. In Reconstruction, leading women’s rights advocate Elizabeth Cady Stanton saw an unprecedented opportunity for disenfranchised groups—women as well as African Americans, northern and southern—to seize political rights. Stanton formed the Women’s Loyal National League in 1863, which petitioned Congress for a constitutional amendment abolishing slavery. The Thirteenth Amendment marked a victory not only for the antislavery cause, but also for the Loyal League, proving women’s political efficacy and the possibility for radical change. Now, as Congress debated the meanings of freedom, equality, and citizenship for former slaves, women’s rights leaders saw an opening to advance transformations in women’s status, too. On the tenth of May 1866, just one year after the war, the Eleventh National Women’s Rights Convention met in New York City to discuss what many agreed was an extraordinary moment, full of promise for fundamental social change. Elizabeth Cady Stanton presided over the meeting. Also in attendance were prominent abolitionists, with whom Stanton and other women’s rights leaders had joined forces in the years leading up to the war. Addressing this crowd of social reformers, Stanton captured the radical spirit of the hour: “now in the reconstruction,” she declared, “is the opportunity, perhaps for the century, to base our government on the broad principle of equal rights for all. "Stanton chose her universal language—“equal rights for all”—with intention, setting an agenda of universal suffrage for the activists. Thus, in 1866, the National Women’s Rights Convention officially merged with the American Antislavery Society to form the American Equal Rights Association (AERA). This union marked the culmination of the longstanding partnership between abolitionist and women’s rights advocates.
Explanation:
Because currently Majority of News Outlets are controlled by democrats and since there are more news stations near the left, biased opinions have occured against the republican party. With this people are getting scared that the news is kind of becoming communist the way Majority news outlets report the same thing, and people see the need for more diversity among news outlets. Though it is pretty over exagerated that people think news is becoming communist
The immediate cause of the outbreak of the First World War is the assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo on June 28, 1914. The reasons are, of course, much deeper, and the causes should be sought in the interests of the great powers, and the assassination was a trigger, by which Austria-Hungary announced the war to Serbia. In addition to imperialism and militarism, the great contribution to war was given by nationalism. Many ethnic groups within Austro-Hungary wanted autonomy and the creation of national states. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was supported by nationalist organizations from Serbia who had an interest in the liberation of Serbs from Austro Hungary and their accession to Serbia. After the war was declared to Serbia by Austro-Hungary, Russia announces the war to Austria wanting to help Serbia, then Germany announces the war to Russia.
The answer is C.
Answer:
While the Chesapeake and New England colonies were founded for the same reasons, economic and religious opportunities the colonies developed differently, including the type of relationship they had with American Indians. Conflicts throughout Europe during the late 1500s brought turmoil to the citizens. People were in search of religious freedom and economic opportunities. New England was founded and formed from English settlers in hopes for change creating opportunities as the land was available, plenty of jobs for skilled and unskilled workers and economic opportunities. The economic opportunities in New England due to the rough and rocky terrain were in shipbuilding, fishing and whaling and manufacturing.
Explanation:
While religious freedom brought many settlers to each colony, the communities that formed followed their views of religion. New England brought in Puritans who followed an active moral code. Settlers supported the ideas of good citizenship, communities and believed in church laws and having town meetings.
