The population of a parish is growing with an annual percentage rate compounded continuously. The population reaches 1.1 times i
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer: x < 2
Explanation: To solve for <em>x</em> in this inequality, our goal is the same as it would be if this were an equation, to get <em>x</em> by itself on one side.
Since 3 is being subtracted from <em>x</em>, we add 3
to both sides of the inequality to get <em>x < 2</em>.
Before we graph, write your answer in set notation.
We can write this as {x: x < 2}.
It's important to understand what this means.
This means that any number less than 2 is a solution to this inequality.
I have graphed the inequality for you below.
Start with an open dot on +2.
We use an open dot because +2 is not included as a solution.
Then draw an arrow going to the left.
Answer:
P-value = 0.0333
At 5% level of significance;
0.0333 < 0.05
Therefore, we reject null hypothesis H₀ at 5% level of significance,
We conclude that proportion of shoppers who bought bananas at least once in the past month is overstated
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the data in the question;
To test whether population proportion p is overstated;
Null hypothesis H₀ : p = (75%) = 0.75
Alternative hypothesis H₁ : = < (75%) < 0.75
now, sample proportion p" = 64 / 100 = 0.64
from the dot plot below, we will determine the p-value for test { P(p" < 0.64)}
so, the number of times p"<0.64 in 150 simulations is 5
Hence; P(p" < 0.64 ) = 5 / 150 = 0.0333
P-value = 0.0333
At 5% level of significance;
0.0333 < 0.05
Therefore, we reject null hypothesis H₀ at 5% level of significance,
We conclude that proportion of shoppers who bought bananas at least once in the past month is overstated
