1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pickupchik [31]
3 years ago
9

Even more so than World War I, known as “The Great War” to its contemporaries, World War II was truly a global conflict, involvi

ng peoples from every continent on Earth in one way or another. Inevitably, civilians were significantly affected by the effects of wartime life. Some groups were affected more than others, however, because Hitler and the Nazis specifically targeted specific categories of people for internment and/or extermination. How do you think it came to be that the vast majority of people in German-controlled lands remained passive as the Nazis ramped up their persecution from ghettoization, to internment in concentration camps, to implementing the Final Solution? Do you think they should have spoken up? Why? Do you think you would speak up if you noticed a steadily increasing hostility toward a minority group? How would you react and what would you do?
History
1 answer:
Akimi4 [234]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

World War II was a devastating event that greatly impacted the world we know today. During the time of the war, singular groups of peoples, most famously the Jewish people of Germany and its surrounding areas, were taken to concentration camps and often killed. However, many other Germans did not fight back at the horrors being committed in their country. It is my belief that this was because they were afraid. Speaking up for those being persecuted could lead you to the same fate, and everyone feared for the lives of themselves and their families. They tried to protect themselves as they waited for other countries to free them from a place where they had almost no rights. While I do believe they should have spoken up, this could have lead to even more devastating effects that could have changed the course of history. If they had spoken up, the war may have been greatly reduced as the Nazis would not have had as much power as had existed when WWII finally did pick up speed. However, because of how dangerous it was, I doubt I would have been able to speak up for those being persecuted, knowing it could end in the same fate for me and my family. However, in modern times it is much more important to speak up in seeing increased hostility toward a minority group because we do not want to lead to the same effects as WWII, which the world is still struggling to repair from. Instead, we should speak out, starting campaigns such as the Black Lives Matter endeavor that grew rapidly in 2020. We need to make sure our voices are heard and that the effects of WWII never need to happen again.

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
In 2005___________ was the fifth largest city in the world with 18.2 million people. by 2015, this city's population is projecte
Angelina_Jolie [31]
Jakarta I believe was announced to being the second largest city in 2015.behing Tokyo-Yokohama.
3 0
3 years ago
Which president closed the Cheyenne-Arapaho lands to the ranchers who were leasing the land from the tribes? A. Adams B. Wilson
Georgia [21]

Answer:

The correct answer is option C: Harrison

Explanation:

In 1890, President Benjamin Harrison unilaterally voided the lease and forced  the ranchers to leave.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1879, when the ____________ reached New Mexico, people sropped using the Santa Fe Trail.
vladimir1956 [14]
In 1879, when the people reached new Mexico, people sropped using the santa fe trail.
hope i answered this question right. (:
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following would be one of Jimmy Carter's greatest achievements in foreign policy?
sveta [45]
The Camp David Accords were when Carter invited the Israeli and Egyptian leaders to America and mediated a peace treaty between them. This was the greatest achievement of foreign policy in his presidency.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In_____, the Indian National Congress adopted Gandhi’s strategy to boycott British goods.
horrorfan [7]
<span>The answer is 1920. The Swadeshi movement was an economic plan meant at eliminating the British Empire from control and refining economic circumstances in India by following the principles of swadeshi and which had some achievement. Plans of the Swadeshi determination involved boycotting British products and the revitalization of local products and manufacture processes.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were families like in early africa
    6·1 answer
  • Who was named Protector of Peru after liberating the country from Spanish rule? A. José de San Martín B. Simón Bolívar C. Father
    6·2 answers
  • How much did the Louisiana Territory cost?
    12·2 answers
  • If you feel like you know World history really well plz plz help me
    13·1 answer
  • The Hundred Years' War was a struggle between
    14·1 answer
  • When u make a choice the experience from what would have been your second option is called
    7·1 answer
  • How does multiculturalism differ from integration?​
    15·1 answer
  • Who led the communists in China?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the Puritans wish to "purify" the Church of England?
    14·1 answer
  • The concept of a wall of separation between church and state refers to which
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!