Answer:
Policymakers submit bills to legal counsel for advice.
Explanation:
The first makes it not harder because it is just saying that u can’t be charged for any reasons that include but are not limited to ur religion , peaceful protest , freedom of speech etc the 14th makes it harder by doesnt make it harder because it’s just talking about equal cuz I’m rights for everyone . I’m not studying law but I looked it up and this is what I found hope this was helpful
Answer:
>have no clue in just need more points
Answer:
a. How will the $20,000 payments be treated by Fred and Tammy if covered by prior law? b. How will the payments be treated if the divorce is covered by new law? c. What is Tammy's basis in the residence? d. What role would a tax adviser play in a divorce?
Explanation:
a. For Fred, the 20,000 must be included in income. There is no deduction for paying alimony. For Tammy, the amount is not included in income.
b. If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Fred can deduct the $20,000 payments as alimony.
If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Tammy must include the $20,000 payments in gross income.
c. It's $100.000,00
d. Tax advisors are responsible for determining the value of property given in lieu of cash for an alimony payment.
Answer:
a) The parties to the contract know too much about their particular interests and as a result, the terms of the contract are not necessarily fair.
Explanation:
