In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
The treaty allowed for the US to give Spain 5 million dollars in exchange for the US to gain ownership of Florida and the western territory of California
let me know if you need anything else
:)
It doesn't have a definition it's a phrase president Thomas Jefferson used in his first inaugural address in 1801 calling for a cautious, isolationist foreign policy
Answer:
Someone from a Southern state would most likely respond with "no, slaves are not equal to white people and should not be counted" examples of this is the modern-day electoral college votes which are mainly based on the population of the white man when first established.
